I liked it alot it was interseting not too hard.
The way the game play was wrapped around the story was really intersesting kinda corny script thouggh would make a good book if longer. It is a very good game despite the graphics and the credits at the end are very different but in a good way.
blub blub
yep kill swing and kill op I die
generic
The whole game seemed like it'd been done before. Even the graphics look very unoriginal. The game itself might've been nicer if it moved at a faster pace. It was well made overall but not unlike anything that hasn't already been made countless times.
Good Remake... and I mean "good"
This was good. But I saw a few problems with this. When you say remake, you mean "remake." I saw almost no difference other than a good story line. I liked the story line and I like the gameplay, but there were some flaws that I wanted fixed on the original. I was expecting some character customization of some sort, like choice of weapons, melee or ranged, and when I first started playing I would figure that a choice in where you're campaign would take you next would be interesting using that map maybe, and I still am a little disappointed that you can't give you're units some simple orders, it may help if you are horribly outnumbered later on. Other than that this game was somewhat average, but it was still a fairly nice remake.
Suggestions
Nice game, 2 things I would change:
1. Make it harder, or make it so your hero can't attack and heal at the same time. My hero has about half as many kills as my army (I just finished #17).
2. Change the dialogue "next" button to "enter" instead of "space," or change the hero attack button. When I finish a battle and my hero is attacking, I'll be holding down space to attack, so then I miss the first several dialogue boxes after the battle.