My Conclusion
To be precise i do believe the umberella man was a homosexual
My Conclusion
To be precise i do believe the umberella man was a homosexual
Is that why I got a 3?
wth
Why wouldn't the guy do anything about it? Like if he wanted to be poked by a old guy with a purple umbrella. He could of used that gun to shoot the guy to!
Because he secretly likes it.
What the?
I kinda feel sorry for the guy, the animation was good but that "Spoh" sound began to drive me crazy, he could have shot the guy with the umberrella, and what was going on in that bed i wonder? Liked the "Devvo Fake" thing, good work.
this thing is missing soooooooooo much
wheres the storyline?
are there any names for the characters?
why does the man being poked kill himself?
why did the man with the umbrella poke him?
WHY DIDNT THE MAN BEING POKED GRAB THE FUGGIN UMBRELLA AND START BEATING THE SHIT OUT OF THE MAN POKING HIM WITH IT?!?!
cuz ya know.........that would have been 10 times funnier if the right SFX was used.
other than that this i would consider something violently abstract.
not my style.......sorry it just didnt cut it for me.
1. Sorry, but expositional dialogue is for 4 year olds. It had an introduction (poking guy comes), a climax (going insane) and a conclusion (gun thing). Hence, it's a story.
2. Character names are irrelevent if there isn't any dialogue.
3. Most people understand it. Read some of the other reviews.
4. Does it matter?
5. I answered this question earlier.
3 WORDS.... W T F
that was a waste of two minutes i could have been doing something else with. the guy in red is some kind of pussy i would have turned around and beat the fuck out of the guy with umbrella. it was only funny the first couple scenes then it was just stupid. And the red guy must have mental issues cuz he shot himself beacuse the guy WASNT poking WTF WTF WTF WTF
Doing something else? Like what? Shmacking off? Watching "The Nanny" repeats? Eating Pringles?