alright
it had an ok plot but it needed 2 be better drawn. other than that it was an ok flash
Reviews for "Monster In The Mansion"
you're sick
WTF dude, why would you hit a cat with a rock!
Other than that, the story was cool and moving
JeremyLokken responds:
You didn't see it, but the cat had it coming. The night before the cat got hit with the rock, he peed all over the owner's furniture. It stank up the whole place! The owner had to hire an expensive cleaning company to take care of it. Now the owner has to work long hours to make up for it, or he won't have enough money for his house payment.
not bad
not bad at all what got me confused was how the hell do u throw a flower halfway down a street and hit some1and it hurts them lol
JeremyLokken responds:
How the hell is there a live red monster?
not impressive
the graphics were primative and poorly animated, the story was lacking in both plot and depth, and the voice acting was so dull and monotonous i wanted to close out halfway through. it lacked any kind of epiphany at the end. this looks like the brainchild of a shitty writer and a mediocre animator. maybe that's why you had to take it to four independent film festivals before it won a single award.
this just isn't good. i'm sorry. i'm sure it was very time-consuming, and i'm sure you're dying to hear lots of glowing approval in the hopes that it might sublimate your meaningless existence, but i for one am not impressed, and i think your flash films need more content and less frivolous film festival name-dropping.
JeremyLokken responds:
Actually, just getting into a festival is hard work. Filmmakers know that. The reason on the timing of winning that "Best Animation" award is because that festival was later in the year.
I'm not dying for any approval. This toon was hard work and I had to defend it, in person, in front of large groups of people. That's something very few flash artists have to go through, most of them just release it to the internet, which gives them the choice of defending it or not.
I'm going to rate your feedback fairly, despite your poor effort. Notice I said “feedback” and not “review.” The first two lines are basically opinion because they don't tell me How it's lacking and how it’s poorly animated? I've got a national award that proves you wrong, from a festival that hosts animation workshops. The rest of your feedback has nothing to do with the cartoon. My toilet gives better feedback, probably smells better too.
My rating on your response: 0/10. I didn't even give you a 1 for effort, unlike the other guy! I will give you advice for leaving a review though, which is probably worth more than a 1/10. Try to examine the story, the characters, what they do and why they do it. Do the characters change, are they different at the end than from the beginning? Once you start to do this, artists will find that you’ll be leaving reviews instead of unnecessary feedback! You can thank me for the advice by leaving a review next time. :)
.
The humor was a little dry, almost non-existant. But this flash isn't about the humor. It's trying to be artsy and meaningful.
However, we don't really know nor care about the characters enough to feel any sort of sympathy for them.
Graphics were OK, I giggled a few times when the guy got hit by the rock. Sound could have used a little work, the voice acting was just too stiff.
Not a bad flash. Not exactly "front page material," but I can see how it got here.