HEY
Ever heard of gradients?
Reviews for "Shading Tutorial -- Flash"
BOW-The-Great responds:
GRADI E NTS???? IVE ONLY HEARD OF GRADIANTS LITTLE BOY, THANKS ANYWAYS FOR YOUR AMAZINGLY HELPFULL REVIEW! NOW GET YOUR MOTHER TO TURN ON THE PG-13 INTERNET FILTER, YOU DONT BELONG ON NG.
Uhhh, no.
I don't know anything about shading..
But I felt you were wrong in most cases.
The shading was horrible..
You had some parts right but you made the shading too obvious.
It's supposed to be a slight transition but the big shading transitions were very ugly.
It's an alright tutorial for "ultra newbs" but it wasn't that great.
yeah.
if you're gonna make a tutorial about shading, just make it about light shading around the adges. shadows kinda thing. with what you just did, you just took unnecessary steps to achieve an effect almost as good as a gradient.
i know you'll say "you don't get the same effect", but... yeah, you do. and it looks smoother and doesn't take as long as what you just did.
also, too much clicking.
Not |so| bad
These lines are long to remove , and i have to admit the gradiant tool is obviously much faster , but it don't give the same effect really.
I got sick of Alice Deejay though . Humor = 2 for the end part. 1337 speak in a tutorial is not so interessing.
BOW-The-Great responds:
3ff3(t 15 \/\/|-|4t (0u/|/t5 50/\/\3t1/\/\35, g00|) 3y3 ;p
Use Gradiant
soupflavoredsoup is right. Just use gradiant. And, the shadows you describe aren't in relation to real-life as you try to make it. It's actually just progession from one color to the other. To complicated. Nice try, though
BOW-The-Great responds:
well the point to get across was the method of shading, not necessarily how good it is, however the reflections were in sync with reality.