Not too shabby.
The graphics quality could have been improved a bit regarding resolution. You could have added some sfx, but otherwise than that it's pretty nice. Worth protecting.
Reviews for "Gumbi - Part 1"
Chrispington responds:
I'm glad it met your standards.
Hypocrite
You were complaining about the quality of newgrounds claymation, but yours is the worst I've seen. If it wasn't such grainy quality, it might have been good, but I couldn't tell wtf was going on.
Chrispington responds:
we wern't talking about image quality, fool.
That basically relies on the length and music quality, of which we have a lot.
Sorry guys.
Its just kind of a bad claymation.
2/5
Chrispington responds:
Sorry to break it to you, but it is better than anything you have made.
Your anger stems from a deep seated pit of jealously, and you can't ever reply to this.
Dude big letdown...
Why is this video so blurry?Are you trying to make me feel like I have catarax?From what I could see they looked like the originals but are messed up in video quality and sound effects but the bg music was good.
Chrispington responds:
ugh... another person who doesn't understand filesize and compression.
Tedious
It wasn't terrible, just nothing special - (doesn't do Gumbi justice).
after you said - "But having seen the low quality of claymation on newgrounds" I completely lost all respect for your animating skills.
Knox is by far a better Claymation author.
4
Saxby
Chrispington responds:
Oh you poor misguided n00b....
we obviously wern't talking about video quality dumbass.