Mustangs like those suck...
U could get som better cars...Anyhow... I'll give u a 4...
Reviews for "Gone in 59 Seconds"
Ryanitto responds:
Okay, with reviewers like you... From now on, DONT WRITE A REVIEW OR VOTE. I mean holy crap, do you people not get this? I shall repeat it:
I was in high school.
I used a Hi-8 camera.
It was early 2000.
Either get your brain straight or go play and vote on J-lo's dress up game because I'm really tired of young teenagers like you.
funny
it was pretty cool. i like the whole movie thing. i just thought it was really funny how you warned everyone about how bad street racing was, yet at the end, you blamed the accident on the kid who walked in the street. hahaha. great touch, not sure if it was intentional, but i loved it.
Ryanitto responds:
Well that's the thing, it is intentional. And I'm hoping everyone GETS that... That's the whole idea of it :) Gj
good
pretty good one. keep it up
Fairly decent
K well at first it kinda sucked but then the funny ending made it all better!!!
....
Okay, the title doesn't have anything to do with the flash. Gone in 60 seconds was a movie...a good one, this had nothing to do about it! Also the car wasn't going very fast, because the guy that was hit was on the windsheild, the must have going like 30 miles pre hour for that to happen. And i notticed he moved him self to the back of the car. Which made no sense, because wouldn't a car be going faster if someone would be hit? And they would be thrown a lot faster then what really happened. I understand the point you are trying to get across, but....don't try.
EVILHAWK
Ryanitto responds:
...The actual movie is 59 seconds if you time it, moron. That's what it has to do with.. the fact that the movie is GONE in 59 seconds. You'd figure a two year old could figure that out.
Second, screw off if you don't like how it looked. Only understand what the content is, dork.