Score:
rated 3.73 / 5 stars
Views:
20,917 Views
Share Links:
Genre:
More Movies
Tags:
None

Click on an icon to vote on this!

Credits & Info

Uploaded
Nov 17, 2003 | 8:51 PM EST
File Info
Movie
2.9 mb
  • Daily 3rd Place November 18, 2003

Related Stuff

If you liked this, check these out!

Author Comments

PLEASE WATCH PART 1 BEFORE WATCHING THIS MOVIE!

Hey again. :)
It seems like a lot of people watching this movie don't know about its sequel, Operation Phoenix, which is a much better movie. I recommend that if you haven't seen it, you click on the Other Submissions menu and check it out when you get the chance. :)

Enjoy!

Reviews

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Sort By: Date Rating

tatadastatadas

Rated 3 / 5 stars May 6, 2011

D: omm

My idea was not this. everyonje dead except the monster>!?

dustbunny123456789dustbunny123456789

Rated 2.5 / 5 stars November 18, 2003

It was "OK"

It had it's good points and it also had it's bad points but i have to admit it was pretty funny but the legs dont move as they walk but i think ya did i pretty good job keep it up

IstariIstari

Rated 2 / 5 stars November 18, 2003

Mediocre

Now, I don't have any problems with cliched, overused storylines- this is Flash, after all, not the Oscars. I do, however, have problems with cliched overused storylines where THE CHARACTERS' FEET DON'T MOVE AS THEY WALK.

It's as if all the characters can psychokinetically levitate themselves of the ground just so they don't have to move their legs. Or, more likely, you drew the models and was too much of a bum to animate them properly.
And when you're talking about an action film, proper animation - proper violence, is the point of the movie.

I don't see why people are giving good reviews. To see a real piece of Flash(and the RIGHT way to animate), check out PUSTOTA, today's daily feature. I watched it several hours ago and am still in awe of it.

People find this review helpful!
RobsH66 responds:

Okay, this review kind of ticks me off.

First, let's disregard the fact that I've replied to this same complaint, and explained the reasons behind it, more times than I care to count. And we'll also disregard the fact that I made this movie almost 5 years ago, when I had very little experience in Flash. And we'll forget about everything I wrote in the Author's Comments, which you should have read before you decided to post such a negative review.

This was never intended to be a very graphics-intensive movie, nor should a movie ever have to be. Sure, flashy graphics and tons of detail are great, but have you ever heard of beauty in simplicity? The lack of character animation is what allowed me to make a movie almost 10 minutes long without spending several years making it, or creating a file so large it couldn't possibly be posted online. I also chose to create this movie in a simplified style to compliment its humorous nature. This is a comedy first and an action movie second; it would take a very ignorant individual to watch this movie and not see that.

You don't see why people are giving good reviews? They're doing so because they are looking past the simple animation, and enjoying the humor and randomness that is the basis of the movie.

I suggest you try being a little more open-minded in the future. Try to appreciate things for more than just their visual appearance. And next time you feel like bad-mouthing someone's hard work, please look at what that person and others have already said about it (ie. read the Author's Comments and previous reviews) before you go shooting your mouth off. Thanks.

MoonDokMoonDok

Rated 1.5 / 5 stars June 15, 2005

i hated the 1st one. the 2nd wasn't much better.

i was hoping that you have been better at Flash this one but i was wrong. sorry about being such an asshole this just isn't worthy of NG.

XeiroyokoXeiroyoko

Rated 1 / 5 stars May 18, 2005

Ok...

It wasn't the gay fat guy who, was impaled. He was the girl, who screamed. The cool guy died... Not fair. The one thing i didn't like was the pictures....I hate picures in flash

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10