Not Bad

the graphics were good, although it could have done wil a little less splitting (the images morphing , attempting to display the effect of an out of tune tv), really ruined alot of the film for me. also, the low resolution sort of made things hard to see.

so, the splitting, low-res and high speed of images really stopped me from seeing any detail in the movie, and add to this the crummy voice acting, really detracted alot from the movie for me.

that said, still liked it, the 3d was a really nice touch, and the message you were trying to tell was recieved with ease

*nods head in approval*

Like the guy underneath me said i couldnt really figure out what was going on with those television possesed people. It was probable my computer but i thought the graphics were good but they looked kinda fuzzy,

Wtf

that was srsly the best animation i've seen on NG. the voice acting was kind of run together, so i couldn't really understand what they were saying. and i couldn't figure out what it was about. killer zombies, killer robots, or killer zombie cyborgs. in any case, it was extremely well done.

it was better thani thought

i think the question that everyone wants to really know is that how long did graphics like that take?

And i don't know if anyone has children or noticed that their was a spoof on a Disney show called "Charlie and Lola" my son used to love that show.

lol it sounded like charlie and Lola where about to get molested or something....not funny to laugh at but the dark humor lives in me. and watching the show....you would just have to see the show.

amazing

just amazing the3-d animation ws great and so was the whole movie