At 7/31/08 02:30 PM, OrionComet wrote: Yikes! 2005 reviews.
SORRY!!! My mistake. Oh!!!! GOLD WHISTLE!!! Thanks everyone!!!
Don't flag ANYTHING on that page.
At 7/31/08 02:32 PM, UnknownFear wrote:At 7/31/08 02:30 PM, OrionComet wrote: Yikes! 2005 reviews.SORRY!!! My mistake. Oh!!!! GOLD WHISTLE!!! Thanks everyone!!!
Don't flag ANYTHING on that page.
Damn, I should have looked at the age.
At 7/31/08 02:32 PM, UnknownFear wrote:At 7/31/08 02:30 PM, OrionComet wrote: Yikes! 2005 reviews.SORRY!!! My mistake. Oh!!!! GOLD WHISTLE!!! Thanks everyone!!!
Don't flag ANYTHING on that page.
YES YOU CAN!!! They're from 2005. Flag everything from the 3 recent years. It's on Rohanthebarbarian's guide.
you know whats funny? I flagged every one of those german posts and I moved from bronze to silver!
WOOT
All of you people are making me jealous of your high whistle levels :(
To think what one knows is to know. to know is thinking what one thinks. Wait, what?
At 7/31/08 02:39 PM, Mtypenguim wrote: All of you people are making me jealous of your high whistle levels :(
Just go to the links we post and flag the bad ones and eventually you will be deity level, before I found this place I was afraid to flag, because I couldn't tell what to flag, and now I'm a silver!
SILVER WHISTLE! Thanks everyone for all your magnificent help.
wow, "normal" whistle, keep 'em comming, guise!
At 7/31/08 02:58 PM, joeyjoe1 wrote: http://angelif.newgrounds.com/reviews/fl ash
Nice one!
http://lordblake.newgrounds.com/reviews/
flash/1
Page 1 - 8/10
Page 2 - 4/10
Page 3 - 1/10
The rest of the pages are clean
So this guy makes for 13 abusive reviews
GAH!
Listening to Metallica - Ride The Lightning
Chav Hunter (insults the author)
Mario Lock It Up (insults the author)
Brokeback Madness (insults the author)
Madness Yiffpocalypse (insults the author but I'm not sure)
Enjoy ! More to come.
At 7/31/08 03:16 PM, Goat-Man wrote: http://lordblake.newgrounds.com/reviews/
flash/1
Page 1 - 8/10
Page 2 - 4/10
Page 3 - 1/10
The rest of the pages are clean
So this guy makes for 13 abusive reviews
but most of them are "okay", kinda annoying, and sorta spamm-y, but not against the rules.
-Emoticrevenge
-Deegz
-Noonit
-rj526
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/41 2945
the only "zero" - blam content
aquaticmole.
Awesome work guys!!!! :)
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /409254/18/score last three reviews
Hey guys! I found a lot of advertising reviews!
http://cladicus-claveman.newgrounds.com/
reviews/flash/1 The Last Stand 2, Joe Zombie :: Episode 1, -The Pan-, The Anger of Animation 3, I hate MAC ads, Operation: Warehouse, N.G. Showdown and Madness Inundation.
http://cladicus-claveman.newgrounds.com/
reviews/flash/2 TANKMEN 2, Waterlollies, GhostFight-BOS-Part1, Metal Gear Awesome 2, Xiao Xiao No. 3 and Xiao Xiao No. 1.
http://lordblake.newgrounds.com/reviews/
flash/1
First 3 are clone spam reviews, 0's for score. They have nothing to do with the submissions being reviewed, they aren't even games.
At 7/31/08 01:55 PM, Homosecksual wrote: I just want to thank you guys for doing this... I already have a Bronze whistle, I think I'm getting closer to that silver whistle :)
Congrats! ^-^
At 7/31/08 04:12 PM, sonofkirk wrote: Doctor Who Part 3 (blam)
Would Madness Consummation be abusive?
I think this is abusive.
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/45 1436
KORNFLAKES review.
Xbox Live Gamertag: GasMaskedMonkey
Brawl Code: 2922-0254-4856
MK Wii Code: 4640-0123-8303
In the forth review of ShadowFang3000, where he says "You just destroyed all forms of intelligence, retard." I was going to mark that as abusive, but I want to be sure.
At 7/31/08 04:14 PM, lilcheeselad wrote:At 7/31/08 04:12 PM, sonofkirk wrote: Doctor Who Part 3 (blam)Would Madness Consummation be abusive?
Hum ... I wouldn'd risk to flag this one.
At 7/31/08 04:19 PM, Megaphor wrote: In the forth review of ShadowFang3000, where he says "You just destroyed all forms of intelligence, retard." I was going to mark that as abusive, but I want to be sure.
http://shadowfang3000.newgrounds.com/rev iews/flash
It's abusive because he calls the author a retard.
Sorry for the double post.
At 7/31/08 04:19 PM, sonofkirk wrote:At 7/31/08 04:14 PM, lilcheeselad wrote:Hum ... I wouldn'd risk to flag this one.At 7/31/08 04:12 PM, sonofkirk wrote: Doctor Who Part 3 (blam)Would Madness Consummation be abusive?
Yeah, I didn't flag it either. It does sound a tad bit abusive though, calling the viewers retarded. I'm not going to risk it.
At 7/31/08 04:26 PM, lilcheeselad wrote:At 7/31/08 04:19 PM, sonofkirk wrote:At 7/31/08 04:14 PM, lilcheeselad wrote:Hum ... I wouldn'd risk to flag this one.At 7/31/08 04:12 PM, sonofkirk wrote: Doctor Who Part 3 (blam)Would Madness Consummation be abusive?
I'm not going to risk it.
Which review are you talking about ?
