What annoyed me most was that i admitted to taking a tincy bit of code, but people still kept on telling me.
The only thing that irritated me that you said it was secure, next time just make a reference, that it needs additional security. As for the moment its allowing php files to be uploaded regardless etc which is still a flaw.
At 7/30/06 02:00 PM, DarkDemon23 wrote: The only thing that irritated me that you said it was secure, next time just make a reference, that it needs additional security. As for the moment its allowing php files to be uploaded regardless etc which is still a flaw.
I posted an example, you cannot upload .php files by using .php.png.
But yeah, maybe you could add some php that checks if it has more than one dot.
At 7/30/06 02:00 PM, DarkDemon23 wrote: The only thing that irritated me that you said it was secure, next time just make a reference, that it needs additional security. As for the moment its allowing php files to be uploaded regardless etc which is still a flaw.
yea, that and you didn't give us a link when you said it wasn't all yours......
not to be mean or anything, but next time give credits
If all of the replies weren't:
FUCK YOU, YOU NOOB!
Then maybe i could of given credits on the 4th post or something.
At 7/30/06 02:03 PM, -Jordan- wrote:At 7/30/06 02:00 PM, DarkDemon23 wrote: The only thing that irritated me that you said it was secure, next time just make a reference, that it needs additional security. As for the moment its allowing php files to be uploaded regardless etc which is still a flaw.I posted an example, you cannot upload .php files by using .php.png.
But yeah, maybe you could add some php that checks if it has more than one dot.
ya well it still uploads it doesnt excute but you know I'm sure there are probably methods of making it run some how. Anyway thats all from me.
At 7/30/06 02:56 PM, Ca1um wrote: I'm sick of everyone calling this insecure and stolen!
Thats an older version, and offline now.
At 7/30/06 07:28 PM, Ca1um wrote:At 7/30/06 04:12 PM, -cherries- wrote: I love you ca1um.That's nice to hear...
Oh and he removed "veiw.php" from his site so you can't see the funny exploit I posted above...
it's ok...i saw it when you did it ;p
Regardless this code is partially stolen, no matter what way you look at it, It's stolen, the only way you can say its yours, is if YOU wrote it.
Lmao cherries, nice code!
At 7/30/06 01:28 PM, -Jordan- wrote: For example this guy:
I took some of a script on a website, doesn't mean i stole the whole thing.
I pretty much ignored everything you said, because of what you said at the bottom.
uhh no correcton, you steal a part of a script, you might as well take the whole thing, and you couldnt have ignored what cherries said, otherwise you wouldnt have replyed.
