At 1/1/03 11:13 PM, LurkerX wrote: I couldn't agree more. Pornography not only interferes with us seeing the site, but it's also just disgusting. I can't imagine why someone would want to look at such horrible content.
d00d.you're a sick bitch.
At 1/1/03 11:13 PM, LurkerX wrote: I couldn't agree more. Pornography not only interferes with us seeing the site, but it's also just disgusting. I can't imagine why someone would want to look at such horrible content.
d00d.you're a sick bitch.
At 1/1/03 11:13 PM, FormidableFoe wrote:
d00d.you're a sick bitch.
I try. ^_^
At 12/31/02 12:55 AM, Cabaal wrote: newgrounds should really remove all those porn links i mean many students arnt allowed to go to newgounds because of the porn links man!!!!
There is more stuff to block than just the porn.
haha that shit is hillarious, seriously why would someone even start this kind of thread, its going to get that type of sick shit in it for sure, that was pretty ghey
Hey guys, just got ba- WTF HAPPENED TO NEWGROUNDS???
know how ya feel man the teachers banned newgrounds at our school . damn teachers. and anyway they do have a porn pay site http://www.newdgrounds.com at least i think they are affiliated newdgrounds has got the tank and everything
At 12/31/02 01:34 AM, whocares666 wrote:At 12/31/02 12:55 AM, Cabaal wrote: newgrounds should really remove all those porn links i mean many students arnt allowed to go to newgounds because of the porn links man!!!!Dude you are level 2 you have no real rank you shouldn't make demands like that not until you actually prove yourself worthy to tom fulp.
That's pure BS. You only need some common sense to know what you are talking about, no level, role or social status can make you more or less right about an argument. What he is asking for is actually very logical. So ye sim calling you statement BS just like you basically did to him.
Spot the person who typed "porn" into the search bar.
At 6/12/15 09:00 AM, DrawingWithArthuz wrote: That's pure BS.
I'm afraid you're 13 years too late with this world changing argument, as this thread was made in 2002.