At 10/13/15 12:48 AM, orangebomb wrote: You're opening up Pandora's box here, and I guarantee you that it isn't pretty. What about all those prepubescent kids on those pictures? I'm sure that they would be pretty horrified that they were naked and being leered at by some scumbag.
Look, that's my point. You don't know if this guy had jailbait he found on 4chan or whatever, or if he had what you just described above.
If he had what you described above, you can disregard a lot of what I'm saying.
If you really did care and defend for that guy, then you by all rights should give him serious help in order to overcome this problem.
Well, wouldn't that be a better solution than locking them up for the rest of their lives?
Not even the most liberal bumblefucks would defend pedophilia as it is now considering all of the sex scandals that Jerry Sandusky and Jimmy Savile had. Explain that.
They raped people. This guy had pictures which for all we know are just people he found attractive who happened to be younger than 18. I think there should be a very real difference in punishment for the two.
Maybe, but do you want to take that chance? Sounds like you already did.
OP should've asked for more information before busting him. That's my point.
At the very least, you do have to admit that the man needs some sort of serious help. There are plenty of drug addicts who get arrested for whatever crime they commit to get clean in prison and/or in rehab, why can't he?
Not arguing with that.
All I'm saying is, you have no proof that he actually had something that was harmful. Keep in mind that jailbait and forceful child rape fall under the same category according to our law. I believe there is a very real difference.
With that all being said, I still think OP is a little too proud about this.