At 8/11/15 09:33 AM, Bit wrote:

At 8/11/15 07:53 AM, larrynachos wrote: I have an ipad

Disgusting.

You're just close-minded, and I think we're derailing from OP a little bit.

Bottom line is, anyone who wouldn't date someone if they like apple products (and keep in mind, she's not an isheep, because SHE HAS A PC) is a shallow @bit ch who doesn't deserve her.

At 8/11/15 11:28 AM, larrynachos wrote:

At 8/11/15 09:33 AM, Bit wrote:

At 8/11/15 07:53 AM, larrynachos wrote: I have an ipad

Disgusting.

You're just close-minded, and I think I'm derailing from OP a little bit.

Bottom line is, anyone who wouldn't date someone if they like apple products (and keep in mind, she's not an isheep, because SHE HAS A PC) is a shallow @bit ch who doesn't deserve her.

>says having standards is "close-minded"
>comma splices up the arse
>resorting to name-calling
>still uses the generic term "PC" despite being politely corrected

Haha. Wow. I almost thought I was on 4chan for a second.

I don't condone the baiting of other users nor do I condone the derailment of threads. In an effort to keep this thread on track, I will no longer reply to your obvious troll posts. Have a nice day.

At 8/11/15 11:49 AM, Bit wrote: I don't condone the baiting of other users nor do I condone the derailment of threads. In an effort to keep this thread on track, I will no longer reply to your obvious troll posts. Have a nice day.

lol, nice job trying to play the victim. I really enjoyed how you tried to hide your blatant loss by correcting my grammar and trying to change the subject to me. Real smooth moves there bud.

No penis, no deal.

At 8/11/15 01:35 PM, Vinnyy wrote:

At 8/11/15 01:34 PM, Radaketor wrote: No penis, no deal.

That's the catch.

Isn't a catch supposed to be a bad thing?

At 8/11/15 02:16 PM, Vinnyy wrote:

At 8/11/15 01:36 PM, Radaketor wrote:

At 8/11/15 01:35 PM, Vinnyy wrote:

At 8/11/15 01:34 PM, Radaketor wrote: No penis, no deal.

That's the catch.

Isn't a catch supposed to be a bad thing?

It's a bad thing for him, apparently.

What kind of a homo doesn't like chicks with dicks?

At 8/11/15 02:22 PM, Radaketor wrote: What kind of a homo doesn't like chicks with dicks?

There must be something wrong with them. Everyone likes chicks with dicks.

Nope, because she's a block of text.

Your description tells very little about this girl. She's just a bunch of character traits. The difference between an attractive girl and a HOT girl is the context, and what kind of past she has that made her, her.

So I would probably not date the piece of cardboard.

BUT, I would slap her Iphone out of her hand and tell her to learn a thing or two about electronics.

She sounds like a poser, my answer is no.

Few other lesser reasons, I prefer girls to be taller/shorter than average but not average.
Another thing is that she has too many interests I'm not interested in. Also too many interests in general, i need stability in my life, and I can't handle all of that chaos.

Also I'm a prude. Kinky is a major turn off.
It's a paradox, I'm aware.

Also I don't date made up people.

At 8/12/15 02:22 AM, Robotao wrote: BUT, I would slap her Iphone out of her hand and tell her to learn a thing or two about electronics.

I don't know who you are, but I like you already.

You and I see eye-to-eye. No iSheepery for either of us.

Correct good sir!

The girl needs to get a device that has enough memory to handle her sudden popularity!

Why not?

At 8/18/15 05:45 PM, Nacholuskey wrote: Why not?

You didn't answer the question.

Sounds like the perfect girl to me.

At 8/18/15 07:55 PM, Bit wrote:

At 8/18/15 05:45 PM, Nacholuskey wrote: Why not?

You didn't answer the question.

I said Why not?.. That's an answer to me.

At 8/19/15 12:32 AM, Nacholuskey wrote:

At 8/18/15 07:55 PM, Bit wrote:

At 8/18/15 05:45 PM, Nacholuskey wrote: Why not?

You didn't answer the question.

I said Why not?.. That's an answer to me.

See "?" <- this sh*t? That's a question mark. It means that your sentence is a question.

It's bad form to answer a question with a question when the person asking the question is looking for a definitive answer.

At 8/10/15 09:22 PM, VGmasters wrote:

Just to clarify, VGmasters.....This IS a women we are talking about....hahaha

Too many variables

YOU FUkD IT UP OP

At 8/19/15 01:02 AM, Bit wrote:

At 8/19/15 12:32 AM, Nacholuskey wrote:

At 8/18/15 07:55 PM, Bit wrote:

At 8/18/15 05:45 PM, Nacholuskey wrote: Why not?

Alright, what do you want me to answer, if you are so determinate to push me writting?