At 10/30/12 05:30 PM, mizzjuicyflava wrote: Ummmm... just because something doesn't go they way we planned doesn't mean we're not making progress. We just have to find a way to make it work.

This would be a falsifiable excuse. We have plenty of space and time to be constructive.

Hey what's going on here??

Nothing out of the ordinary.

At 10/30/12 05:24 PM, Tankdown wrote: Fantastic

Now what are your problems.

I don't have any. I'm physically, mentally and sexually healthy. I can do just about anything I set my mind to. I have no serious fears, and only avoid things like daredevil type heights. The proper question would be ''What was your problems that you've long fixed?'', and that would be anger issues, withdrawal, obsessed with pornography, being an asshole out of fear of my insecurities and obsessed with physical strength, hence I used to carry cinderblocks, of all things, around my neighborhood and 20 blocks down to a park from time to time. I have long fixed my weaknesses and my lifestyle.

At 10/30/12 05:52 PM, Entice wrote: Did you ever drop one on a cat?

Your intentions are ignominious.

At 10/30/12 06:02 PM, dem0lecule wrote:

At 10/30/12 05:24 PM, Tankdown wrote: Fantastic

Now what are your problems.

Making thinking-threads is his orgasm. You have to understand him.

Every time he fucks a dog and is about to cum, PLOP! a shit thread appears.

At 10/30/12 05:50 PM, Insanctuary wrote: I don't have any. I'm physically, mentally and sexually healthy.

Not a single amount of hatred for yourself? Even a little?

At 10/30/12 06:15 PM, Tankdown wrote:

At 10/30/12 05:50 PM, Insanctuary wrote: I don't have any. I'm physically, mentally and sexually healthy.

Not a single amount of hatred for yourself? Even a little?

He's a pseudo intellectual who fucks dogs! It's the best life anyone could POSSIBLY want to have!

At 10/30/12 06:15 PM, Tankdown wrote: Not a single amount of hatred for yourself? Even a little?

I don't live as the person I am being accused for being. I'd hate what you accuse me for being, but I can not hate myself for the person I am in which is irrelevant to your accusations.

At 10/30/12 06:32 PM, Insanctuary wrote: I don't live as the person I am being accused for being. I'd hate what you accuse me for being, but I can not hate myself for the person I am in which is irrelevant to your accusations.

I didn't accuse you of anything in that post Insanctuary. I ask because everyone should have a honest opinion of themselves.

Yes, I did indirectly accuse you that time.

At 10/30/12 08:09 PM, Tankdown wrote: Yes, I did indirectly accuse you that time.

As long as you do not accuse me, then you don't have to worry with me. Alas, I still remember your responses to me in my other threads, so I am still watching your every intention towards me.

At 10/30/12 08:17 PM, Insanctuary wrote: As long as you do not accuse me, then you don't have to worry with me. Alas, I still remember your responses to me in my other threads, so I am still watching your every intention towards me.

........Why in god's name wouldn't I expect you to read my avatar's name!? Or did you think I calculated that you have a short term memory span for whoever posts in the threads you make!?

At 10/30/12 08:20 PM, Tankdown wrote: ........Why in god's name wouldn't I expect you to read my avatar's name!? Or did you think I calculated that you have a short term memory span for whoever posts in the threads you make!?

I don't understand your intentions right now, but the more you test my patience, the more power I will have over you.

At 10/30/12 04:38 PM, Jester wrote: You're all fools for trying to argue with him.

But arguing is fun, whether or not you will win or lose and whether or not you are right.

At 10/30/12 12:34 PM, Insanctuary wrote:
Strange. Usually when people are confused by something, they can't determine what it is.

"as well you also seem to try and 'confuse' a reader"

I do recall that everything you've just said about my OP is in the Bible a thousand times over. Nobody complains because whatever is making you say these things about me and my OP, it isn't healthy and it is down right biblical.

Oh really? Honestly I wouldn't know because I've never read the bible nor do I believe in any sort of organized religion. So it would be a huge coincidence if this was true, but something tells me it's not. As well it's unfair for you to say because I disagree with your OP and have a different perspective then you, that what ever drives this prospective is that of an unhealthy nature.

I believe I was very respectful in my post and didn't attack your character as much as I attacked your OP for it's lack of substance while trying to sound "deep", as if what you had typed was some new found prospective on the world that would change the way we processed reality. The bottom line is, your OP was mere non-sense, sure it had some "meaning" but your way of delivering the information was a failure, at least in my opinion, and it attempted to be deep when in reality it wasn't.

I've noticed that you choose certain words in your post to make yourself sound more intelligent. While I don't doubt that you aren't an idiot, I think you try way to hard to use certain words and type in a certain fashion that it actually backfires and make you seem like you are full of shit. You seem to go for this philosophical wisdom when it's not needed.

At 10/30/12 06:05 PM, koopahermit wrote:
Every time he fucks a dog and is about to cum, PLOP! a shit thread appears.

Respect.

At 10/30/12 06:17 PM, koopahermit wrote:
He's a pseudo intellectual who fucks dogs! It's the best life anyone could POSSIBLY want to have!

Neglect.

Every time insanctuary posts i die alittle inside

At 10/30/12 10:52 PM, Boss wrote:

At 10/30/12 06:05 PM, koopahermit wrote:
Every time he fucks a dog and is about to cum, PLOP! a shit thread appears.

Respect.

At 10/30/12 06:17 PM, koopahermit wrote:
He's a pseudo intellectual who fucks dogs! It's the best life anyone could POSSIBLY want to have!

Neglect.

I guess I should've posted [SARCASM] in big bold words at the bottom.

At 10/30/12 11:04 PM, koopahermit wrote:
I guess I should've posted [SARCASM] in big bold words at the bottom.

calling someone out 4 being a pseudo intellectual is SO 2011 dude

At 10/30/12 11:05 PM, Boss wrote:

At 10/30/12 11:04 PM, koopahermit wrote:
I guess I should've posted [SARCASM] in big bold words at the bottom.

calling someone out 4 being a pseudo intellectual is SO 2011 dude

Dammit.

At 10/30/12 08:32 PM, Insanctuary wrote: I don't understand your intentions right now, but the more you test my patience, the more power I will have over you.

Flip a coin.

Think of Newton's third law.

Prior before is a miss guess.

At 11/1/12 02:51 PM, Urban-Champion wrote: men + dicks + assholes = Insanctuary logic

That would be improbable, hence that formula starts with you.