Now one article is probably more "realiable" the the other since one is obviously a site directed at a pro-marijuana agenda. so I've provided to as a "head start" for you people to do your own research, if you can't be bothered you probably should just shut your mouths when speaking about things you assume and don't know for certain.
It's amazing how quick today's society is to dismiss something that goes against what they were taught and even more sickening they expect all these sources and information to be handed to them. Because if it isn't they couldn't give two shits whether such a thing is true and would rather keep spewing what they assume is right.
I mean in terms of elections, do you honestly take what ad campaigns say or do you do your own research. If you chose option one, you are a dumb ass and congrats on being a follower with no intent on educating themselves.
Now the first one I believe talks about using a modified compound found in cannabis while the second one talks about cannabis. I'm not sure if they are referring to the same thing and personally I'll do my own research later because it fancies me right now, I expect you to do the same.
But knowing most people they'll hop on one page, skim, say I'm a fucking idiot and etc etc.