I've not, as you can tell, an awesome photographer. It's more of a side-hobby of mine. Some people said they were "decent" so I would like some critism (constructive) on the downsides to my photos.
Thanks
1st one:
This was taken at Chester Zoo (Ironicly not an animal), I decided to try and close up/macro shot.
Another Macro shot :)
Apologies for the first image's quality. I had to save it from my "Flickr" account as the original photo is on my other computer. I'll get it some time this week.
A tree. 'Nuff said.
50+ Views and not 1 reply? :(
At 2/13/09 02:58 PM, Blankpoint101 wrote: A tree. 'Nuff said.
50+ Views and not 1 reply? :(
Because there isn't much to reply too. Its your standard run of the mill photography taken with a nice camera. Its not shit, but its just not interesting. You cant blame the subject matter either, because I've seen some damn fine and interesting shots taken of the exact same things you are using.
