00:00
00:00
Upgrade Your Account!

Hey! To start this decade right, we believe Newgrounds should be ad-free for EVERYONE. For this to work, we need people who have the means to become paying supporters. For just $3 per month or $25 for the year, you can help this happen and get some nice perks!

For the month of January we have disabled ads on all E-M content. We need 195 people to reach our January goal of 3,000 active supporters. If we hit that, we'll continue with a new goal in February!

Please check out our Supporter Upgrade and consider coming aboard!

Reviews for "Zone-Tan's Leaked Sex Tape"

bruh

Freakorama1 responds:

bruu

69/10 Is it possible to download a copy of this for my own "personal uses" somewhere? (Im obviously not gonna edit it cause it's perfect as it is)

dayum! u went all out on this huh. looks like you might have actually purchased the $300 zone tan model from turbo squid. one of the best, usually porn flashes r just 1 continuous loop NOT this one i love that. only places that this video could possibly improve are in three areas.

1. the ass jiggle, the boobs had great physics but ass barley moved when being pounded.

2. with the exception of the foreskin the dicks looks very static, you may think guys focus only on zone tan but psychologically guys pay more attention to dicks in porn than we realize (something to do with vanity... but why else would "big dicks" be a porn genre?)

3. you could have probably gotten caxx (zone tans voice actress to help you with the audio)

despite the room for improvement its better than about 99% of what I've seen, that's still an A on a test, and since in a letter grading system there are 5 grades you should get 5 stars.

Freakorama1 responds:

Thank you, but there's absolutely no way Caxx would have wanted to be involved with this.
Plus it's kinda keeping in the Zone spirit to work with out of context clips.

What is the song in the 25sec?

Freakorama1 responds:

Try reading the credits.

That's one deranged ass baby
I mean damn, was that squidward

Freakorama1 responds:

No, this is Patrick.