Reviews for The Creation of High Art

[Smakatrosmic]

Eh.

I've got no qualms with the animation or sound. However, when you say the narrator is supposed to "be an unreliable narrator masquerading as a reliable narrator," I immediately think this is a cop-out. The narrator's argument is faulty and easily refutable; did you just say it was intentional as an artistic way of covering your amateur assessment of how high art is determined? That's what it seems like to me. There is no biting sarcasm or satire here to justify the narrator is being erroneous on purpose; it shouldn't be so vague that you would need to tell the audience prior to the flash.

[thome523]

he's right

never lisson to any critic half the time they have not watched seen or tasted whatever there talking about and the other 48% there dnt know what there talking about and make it sound that there clever.

[Hamslice]

Informational and good

The drawings were good, not a lot of actual animation, but the message is more important anyways.

When I showed my aunt(a painter) my flash cartoons, she asked if I had any 'real art' to show her. So much anger at idiocy...

[oyevintj]

5/5 goes to this

A good explanation on how such crappy pictures... (some of them) becomes art ... thank u for enlightening my day :P

PS: Funny refrence to Neon Genesis Evangelion :D

[DeadValentine]

Funny

LITTLEkidd, please refrain from acting like you would know the difference between "high" art and "low" art, seeing as how distinguishing this is impossible, (example) the meaning to lyrics in songs, they sing to the lyrics they write, they write them for a reason (most of the time) however it is not a set rule to abide by, its simply what that song means to its writer, the listener is the one that decides what it means to them, so on and so forth...

Definition of Art: the creation of beautiful or significant things