NO!!! NOT FL!!!
I can't use fl on my computer!! D: (.exe file, mac computer.) anyway, great song. 10/10 5/5, loved it. always wanted to be like you! i feel like i've heard this song before, but it wasn't in any submissions... weird. once again, i love the song! :D keep up the good work!!!
Awesome
This is awesome. i like all of your work :D
1500th voter here, with a preposition.
This song is great. I LOVE what you did from 0:29 to about 0:59 in the song... Excellent build-up. I also like the ambient sequences after that- good variety.
What I don't like about the song is how it, after about :59, just builds up into nothing for the rest of the song? Where did the all the synths go?
Take the ideas from 0:29 to about 0:59 and rebuild this song into something that I'm going to have to put on a digital pedestal in my music library!
JESUS!!!
aweosme1!~ I loved every bit of it, and yea i spelled awesome wrong too lazy to bk track
the reason
The reason that this sounds so good is because it is a 7.8 MB file for a 3:25 song. most uploads on newgrounds is 3.6 MB for a 3:25 song. not saying that's bad to do that but I just wanted to point that out.
Trance on.
You are half correct. Having a bigger sized mp3 means that the quality of the ENCODING is much better (meaning that the song can be played back without lossy compression).
However, PRODUCTION quality has almost nothing to do with the mp3's bitrate. I mean, let's say (theoretically) that one day I just went into FL and threw in some random 3xosc preset that came with the program, then didn't take any time on the song at all, called it "finished," and rendered it to an uncompressed wav?
;)
Does that suddenly make it sound "better" than a 192 kb/s mp3 that was produced with great care?