booooring
unorganized, controls were the main turn off unless you have 3 arms. overall just not fun
Reviews for "Flash Racer"
I for one really liked it
I thought it was awesome! Good job with it! I don't understand why people don't like this one on the game page. It totally deserves what it got. I mean, it's better than the majority of some of the stuff on NG. And it is actually of professional quality. So, I don't really care what other people are saying...this ROCKS!
WAY OVER RATED...
this game was boring...
grafix:
nothing speical. the cars were good but the tracks were pixely crap. and the characters looked idiotic.
style:
just not good. some of the things that the AI said just seemed to be stupid.
sound:
poor choice of music, and no SFX except for the "bing bing bing!" before every race.
violence:
there was some.
Interactivity:
AIs acted poorly, options were all basic.
humor:
there wasn't any.
overall:
pros: nice car grafix, plenty of tracks & cars.
cons: no depth in gameplay, FPS was very low (ranging from 5-15) even on low quality, cars all felt the same, AI replies were lame, ugly tracks, weapons were boring to use and were pointless, game was to easy even on hard, not to mention a HUGE amount of other proplems that I dont want to list.
Why?
How did this make it to the front page? Generous voters that's what. they find a game that's actually playable and they instantly give it a 5.
The weapons were as useless as the points in Who's Line Is It Anyway?. The music was boring. There could at least be some variation to it. The History mode had a horrible story. The only thing I liked about it was the menu, the only innovative part of the entire thing.
it was good but rather annoying
you really got to work on the collision detection man like i was getting thrown off when i wasnt even near a wall or car and this game could use some more sound engines maybe the fire of the guns and explosions but other then that it was a very good game