Once I realized it was intending to seem quite realistic and the big guy got some shots in, it was hard to imagine the little guy should have much chance, though I knew it was inevitable, I would have been VERY surprised if you had let the big guy win. Naturally I was hoping the whole time he would. Of COURSE the big guy would have speed working against him, of course he is going to be slower, because size=slow, right? At least in cartoons. Should no tears be shed for the big guy? Should I think of the big guy as the bad guy, because the smaller guy was smaller, and also a tired, old man? Kissing his religious icon? Is that supposed to make me root for him as well? Because of course the bad guy never is driven by religion, oh no. The big guy wasn't dumb. He may not have been a mindless brute, beating up on the little guy because his mother never taught him better. When the little guy got him in a sleeper hold, he immediately performed the action that would save his life. And what was he fighting for? Maybe the big guy was fighting for a just cause, just because he was fighting against someone smaller than him doesn't mean he was the villain. Maybe the little guy is just about to press a button on the other side of the room that will launch the nuclear missiles. I feel I'm casually expected to root for the little guy since presumably the odds are stacked against him, but of course in a cartoon fight, it's the other way around, the big guy stood as much chance as the coyote against the roadrunner, even though in real life, coyotes are twice as fast as roadrunners. And like that, the realism has to fail. The moment it fails is at 1:45. That's the moment it goes from plausibility to cartoon physics. Sorry, but it's true. I don't care what new resolve that guy gathered, or how much stronger he shows himself to be than he possibly could be. He would have needed to be denser than concrete to have pulled that off considering their difference in physical size, otherwise his own mass moving at that speed wouldn't have been enough to accelerate his opponent as it did on impact. And everything after that point is pure nonsense, any of the big guy's gripping and casual blows would have ended him. I guess the goal of this was to depict a little guy beating a big guy in as realistic a way possible while keeping it exciting, but the problem is, the only way it can be done realistically in the real world would be a much shorter, less exciting fight. Still an interesting watch I guess. All I'm saying is, if I was supposed to feel a moment of triumph there at the end, I am more inclined to play devil's advocate. Sympathy for the big guy.