Be a Supporter!

SS - Human History 3

rated 3.49 / 5 stars
Share Links:

Click on an icon to vote on this!

Credits & Info

Jul 26, 2011 | 12:22 PM EDT
  • Daily 4th Place July 27, 2011

If you liked this, check these out!

Author Comments

After the Martians collapsed the Atlantean way of life, the Naacals didn't know what to do. They asked for help from the highest conscious beings in our universe, and they received a potential solution. If it could pull it off, we would become something incredibly new and different in the universe. If we did not, we would not survive. Our entire planet was walking a very thin line.

Links and Sources - Remove the Spaces

Twitter - @itsjordand
Facebook - ages/Spirit-Science/21023 8862349944?ref=ts

Flower of Life books - le/iWmQem1a/Flower_of_Lif e_PDFs.html
See page 104 Volume 1 for this portion of the Human History Story!

Birthing of a New Humanity tch?v=-L96rRtmt9E

Planetary Crystalline Grid
http://www.childrenofthes om_content&view=article..

Cayce's channelings /are/ px?id=2071

Bermuda Triangle iki/Bermuda_Triangle



Rated 4.5 / 5 stars

Seriously man stop with the cliff hangers


Wherever there is people, there will be haters. I can understand your closed mind seeing this for what it very blatanly is, some flash that goes against everything you basically know, with little "valid" reasons behind it. You see the thing is when it comes down to something like this is, you have to decide for yourself whether or not it is valid. I personally am listening to it, trying to see if the funny pieces can fit on the puzzle board, and also regularly going to those links or downloading the PDF's and read up on it.

For most of the time his statements line up pretty darn well with the cites work, for example in the Birthing of a New Humanity, Drunvalo Melchizidek tells that he went to Egypt and told them of the pyramid being made from the top down. They laughed at him as a normal person would, but they checked anyway. Low-and-behold they discovered the mortar on the top was older than that on the bottom.

Conclusion, he asks us to keep an open mind and you tried, but without solid evidence you chose you couldnt. On a side note, I believe somewhere he said to take it like a story, and stories can be fictional, but thats another thing you didnt do

Now as for the flash, it was great. I may not understand every bit of it, nor may I believe every bit, but it was still entertaining. I look forward to the end of the Human History saga you have going. I only have one question: You said it yourself that it takes 100,000+ years to reach Christ Consciousness, so how did the Atlanteans have it? I know there was Lemuria and other places before Atlantis but did they really exist 100,000+ years ago?

People find this review helpful!
RiverJordan responds:

Oh yeah, we've been around for at least 200,000 years actually. Further, from what i understand we were born into christ consciousness. If the story is true, the Nifilim are our father race and the Sirians (not the dolphin ppl, different beings) are our mother species. The sirians were 4th dimensional and at a very high consciousness, the Nilim were also in christ consciousness i believe. The lemurians were born at a high level as well.


Rated 2.5 / 5 stars


which poison do we have to drink to make the cults mothership takes us to mars?
still funny though


Rated 4.5 / 5 stars

very well done.


Lol your not to smart are you?
Hes not trying to pass it off as accepted, hes just talking about it,
as he has said far more times then once, he wants us to view it with an open mind, not to jump in and accpet it and not to just say "NO! this wrong that wrong we right not you!"

And why do you think hes made over 12 videos about it already, becuz he cant give ALL the infomation in one damn video, if he was to give ALL the info from small pointless details to big facts, then he would need to make a video most likly over 12 hours long!

To be honest, i dont belive half of this, im non-religos and im going to stay that way,
But it seems to me its only the non-religos and very few weak religos people that can keep an open mind and chosie for them selfs wether they want to agree with parts or not, not the whole thing yes or no, but parts, thats keeping an open mind.

And about people beliving it cuz its just being said over and over:
A) the same can be said about all religons,
B) this is the first i've ever heard of this and i belive a good over half of it cuz it MAKES SENCE, unlike anyother religos you types have in the past tryed pushing and pulling me into beliving, a magical nothing made its self then made the world in 6 days then had a nap and now murders millions day by day, lets the evil ones get power and lets the good ones die, a god that if you dont kneel down and suck his cock (metaphoricly) he will damn you to internal pain and torment just for keeping an open mind that there might be more to like then magical man that is god.

And its spiret since, half religon, half science, not 100% science so stop using that as a reason you bash somthing that goes agenst your god cuz you've been brought up to fear your god so much that you need to be agresive to anyone that makes you think even for a fraction of a second that there might be more to life then god.

Religon is nothing more then a cult run by fear.


Rated 3.5 / 5 stars

only one thing is starting to bug me

it seems to me that you are using the phrase "Christ Conscience" a bit too much and it is starting to annoy me. If you know any other alternative ways to say it , well feel free to use those alternatives.

RiverJordan responds:

Nope, gotta use Christ. It will make sense by the end ;)


Rated 1 / 5 stars

More Poor Science

As mentioned before, I'm concerned that you are passing off theories as accepted, when the reality is oherwise. The Bermuda Triangle is a great example, and you touch on this in this video. Lloyds of London (amongst other insurers who provide coverage to cargo ships) has done studies on the area, to determine if any type of sea/air transport is at a greater risk of loss. Their researchers found that this region of the ocean is no more or less dangerous than any other. The U.S. Navy recognizes that the area has strong currents, but is otherwise not a region that poses any danger. The "Bermuda Triangle" theory stems mainly from one book by Charles Bertz, and the "research" that went into that book has been thoroughly debunked, including many errors in the coordinates of ships and aircraft that have been lost and relying on works of fiction as valid data sources. Most of the books written since then that purport to present "research" do not present research at all. They represent "communal reenforcement" by merely restating the claims of previous writers. What is untrue becomes "accepted" because it is repeated often enough.

You always ask the viewer to keep an open mind. I would suggest you do the same by using a critical eye to look at the uncritical research you cite. Though your flashes are relatively harmless, I can offer the example of Andrew Wakefield as a harmful example of communal reenforcement. While clinicians and researchers debunked his work and found fatal flaws with it relatively early on, enough inept researchers and others who were unqualified regurgitated his claims as valid, causing more people to view his findings about autisim and vaccinations as valid. Not only did this result in a great number of people pursing therapies that were ineffectual at the least and harmful at the most, but it also diverted resources away from the pursuit of more valid avenues of study. Even now, with Wakefield's work having been fully debunked, many people still believe it to be valid, simply because it has been aped over and over and over again.

As I said in an earlier review, if you are going to present this as informative, follow accepted guidelines for doing so. Present ALL research into your claim, whether it be supporitive or dismissive. By omitting the complete body of evidence to focus only on a narrow portion which supports your worldview, you are practicing some of the same narrow-minded science you have been critical of in earlier flashes. Or to put it more bluntly, if you were a grad student of mine presenting this as valid work, I would give you a failing grade, for reasons cited here and in my previous review. Hence the low score given to your flash.

There's some debate, but overall people find this review helpful