It was inevitable, I suppose.
For every movement, there is an anti-movement. For every thing that becomes popular, there are going to be people who scoff at it, for some reason. I like to call them anti's - haters, for the layman. More often than not, these people will hate one part of popular culture, and still love another. In other words, an anti might hate the Parody Rangers, but think that, for example, Chuck Norris facts are hilarious.
Something that I've noticed to be a common trait among these anti's is that they think their's is the "right" opinion. Indeed, what is really an opnion, an anti would claim as fact, and according to them, when the anti says something should be a certain way, by George, there's no room for discussion.
Here, for example, the creator of this flash thinks that the Parody Rangers were never any good, and the whole series needs to be put to rest, immediately. Of course, this is an opinion, but this person, for reasons beyond my comprehension, seems to be stating his opinion as a fact. Actually, he pretty much outright demands that Kirbopher comply with what he is demanding, as though he believes it really is the only correct course of action.
Another common trait that I've noticed among the anti's, is how offended they get when their opinion, or their method of expressing their opinion, rather, is questioned. For example, I am of the opinion that this anti's method of expressing his opinion is rather poor. It comes across as unnecessarily crude, somewhat uncalled for, and almost sounds like the petulant child who didn't get the cereal with the marshmallows. I wonder how the anti will react to this review? I think I have a pretty good idea what it would be like, but I think any actual response would look like "Nuh-uh!"
Really, if people think the Parody Rangers are funny, so what? If people can find humor in the inane, what does it matter? People are laughing, and you have a problem with it?