Too short, too simple
First, this is definitely too short. One question with several unequally weighted answers is not enough to determine nerdom. Secondly, you should differentiate between a "nerd" and a "geek". The way I see it, and what I tell most people, is that nerds have academic knowledge (science, programming, math, history, something that is taught), while geeks have trivial or media knowledge (Star Wars, Star Trek, anime, movies, TV, something that is not taught). There are cross-overs as well, such as music, which might go either way.
And, yes, I realize that my review proves that I am a nerd.
to short I mean one question?!
im agreein with bakkerkid! plus ther are soooooooooooo many glitches in it!!! like i picked the same two ansers twice and it gave me a diffrent score each time!
it is impossible to give you a different score twice if you click the same answers... THE SCORES ARE NOT RANDOMLY GENERATED!
BBBBBOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!! 0/10 0/5
Terrible! Never Playing It Again!
Its absolutely not representative
1) its not representative, a test like this should contain at least 50 questions/testings to be able to be considered real.
2) add music
3) it was palin booring