GASP! Aci6, you think the cat didn't fly up as high as it should and that the stars are too far apart in sections? You mean to say, in other words, that this game is TOO HARD and you think it should be EASIER? That you don't feel you should have to use actual STRATEGY which requires you to WISELY use your 3 jumps and actually have a tiny amount of skill and coordination when getting the stars? Oh heaven forbid there be a game that you can't win by mashing the whole keyboard with the palms of both hands the way you would prefer to play every game! Probably while screeching at your computer like a monkey to boot. Frigging idiot. I just won it 3 times in a row and it wasn't very hard, I used up only 1 of my 3 jumps the last time, I guess I should have used more just because I could have shaved a few milliseconds off my time and maybe it would have rounded to the next whole second. And my score of 1260 doesn't even make it on the top 50, the bottom of the all time leaderboard starts in the 1700s. Although the top 3 are flagrantly frauds. Obviously thatax is the top real score, and possibly the only one ever to get to 2000 and get the gold medal award if Janice B's suspiciously contrived single score of 2005 is simply a more plausible fabrication, while I can see thatax tried over and over again to get to 2000.
Then again, I just obsessively played a stupid blackjack derivative called jazz21 and suddenly got over 30000 legitimately because I just kept going and going getting the cards I needed, and no one else has ever managed 20000, so who knows about that sort of thing.
But it's not a special game. I just had to react to stupidity as I saw the stupid comment. It seems something is missing, indeed, but I'm not sure what. Hutzpah. It needs hutzpah.