Here begins my quest to study your work; consider whether you have been reasonably treated and give it support in an appropriate manner, as promised:
1. You 'sell' it as a short preview. Generally we dont like previews much, as Tom warns you- but as this is a small story in its own right- a 'cameo' if you like, your reviewers and voters have said its too small but still given you 9/10 etc. This is generous by most people's standards. the reivew score translates as nearly 4/5, with is pretty good for any piece this short, despite its top quality art.
Your art ability is not in dispute and the feeling that this and you have potential is clearly expressed. the guy who wrote the silly 'poo' review can be ignored- as he has written something (mildly) abusive and nothing constructive to go with it you should (with our support) get your friends to mark it abusive and it may well be removed.
As this was intended to introduce us to your style and your characters, you rather let yourself down- you have not yet corrected the spelling mistakes and you admit the text goes by too fast. As you create new movies in a series people go back and look at the old ones. Your fans- you WILL get them- and your reviewers will support you more if you improve your old movies as well as moving forward, taking their opinions into account (but not following them slavishly).
The art is great and the animation is OK/good, but sometimes I cannot make out what things are and what is going on all that easily. - I'm sorry that I cannot pinpoint why.
I watched it three times to get all the details but we should only vote on the first viewing
The title is crap- whatever you meant when you named it - ditch it and pick something worthy of this poinient, atmospheric little piece
You did well to manage all the voices yourself as well as you di, but as director you should really be getting better voices- you did the girl surprisingly well but her mum sounds pretty rough, not the gentle 'mummy' voice we would truly sympahtise with.