Be a Supporter!

Burnt Face Man 6

rated 4.25 / 5 stars
Share Links:
Comedy - Original

Credits & Info

Mar 4, 2006 | 2:41 PM EST
  • Frontpaged March 5, 2006
  • Daily Feature March 5, 2006
  • Weekly 2nd Place March 8, 2006

If you liked this, check these out!

Plenty more like this here!

Author Comments

It's another one for whoever wants it. Another 5 minute episode (5 minutes seems to be the standard these days) Hope you like it.

-Dave /



Rated 3 / 5 stars

I laughed at the 'points of view'.

selected aspects (rated from ----- to +++++)
(note: I'm not rating everything or trying to break the flash up into constituent parts. Just indicating how much each adds to/detracts from my enjoyment of this.)

+++: the writing of the episode was an interesting 'gimmick' to focus on. Allowed for some interesting jokes.

+++: A few unforseen twists.

++++: The 'points of view' made me chuckle.

-: The fact that BFM was merely ATTEMPTING to write the episode was a bit confusing.

--: Many of the jokes were a bit obvious.


Enjoyed it to a small extent, but I suppose this series just isn't my cup of tea. I won't bother watching the series.


Rated 3 / 5 stars

OK, where to start........

I found this qutie boring my mate told me these were wicked but the only poeple i can see who find this funny are nerds and geeks really(not saying i am one) i just thought it was rubbish honestly.


Rated 3 / 5 stars


This is a very funny series!


Rated 3 / 5 stars

Burnt Face Mans own show

This was fun BFM (burnt face man) episode and there was fuw funny scenes but some of them were just stupid and unfun. Anyway graphics and sounds were like old superhero show and I liked it, nice work


Rated 3 / 5 stars

Nothing special

Funny how Burnt Face Man didn't do so well when he first came on here, I remember reviewing the first one when it was first in the portal - I thought it was pretty amusing, put it on my favourites. But I come back to NG and have a look at the 6th and it's really nothing special, yet eclipsing everything else out today! It clearly surfs in atop this pathetic disgraceful firth worshipping thing that's going on here - no wonder you act like such a sarcastic condescending bastard, it's almost worth you posting movies just so we can read the reviews, which were in this case, far more entertaining than the movie itself. I always think it's a shame when people ruin a good thing by succumbing to consumer demand, firing out lame sequels until it's well-dead, and I can't help but feel you've done that a bit here. Don't get me wrong, it was alright - but I think if you rate it on it's own merit, not on your popularity, this is more a 3. I won't bother softening my review mentioning what was good, you've probably heard it already.