At 12/3/08 05:45 PM, nal1200 wrote:
At 12/3/08 02:24 PM, F-777 wrote:
I wish there was a voting system like people could vote 0-5 but they could also vote "Vote for this submission to get top 5?" and then the the 5 most voted get top 5 that way Ng users could actually get songs they like up there and there would be no way for 0-bombers to ruin you chance =).
That's actually a pretty damn good idea.
It never occurred to me, but perhaps a nomination system would fare more favorably than a voting system.
If each person got 1 nomination per week, we could easily see which songs are being focused on the most (assuming most people work nominate their own) by way of who's song got the most nominations.
This would abandon the rating system, and rightfully so, as currently The BEST of the WEEK is not a representation of which songs are the best submissions of the those submitted this week, but rather a culmination of which songs survived the terror that is rampant democracy.
With a nomination system, there is no negativity and more importantly a more fair representation of the public voting pool.
DISCUSS!
Here's how I would have it:
1) Tracks that make Weekly Best were submitted in the past week and received the most nominations between then and midnight (NG Time) on Wednesday.
Sounds good to me.
2) Users get five nominations per week, cannot nominate their own tracks, and cannot nominate a track multiple times
I also would prefer multiple nominations, perhaps 5, to only one - users would only be able to nominate a track once, but wouldn't have to choose between two gems submitted in the same week.
3) Nominations are not publicly viewable, they're hidden.
Suggesting this one. Eliminates competition a bit further, and encourages users to nominate based on the track, rather than previous nominations.
4) In the case of a tie, the order is determined the current way.
I'm suggesting this one as well. If each user gets 5 nominations, ties should be uncommon, but in the case this happens, the current system should be a lot fairer in my opinion - nobody knows that the tracks are tied, so zero-voting is useless.
5) The current rating system (instead of being abandoned) will only be used to determine genrelists.
Unless there's a better way? Nominations doesn't seem appropriate here.
Also, unless we think of a solution, someone who joined the site yesterday would have the same nominating power as, say, a signed producer, which doesn't make sense to me. :\ Would it directly follow voting power, would it work differently, or is this unnecessary?
That's my view on this all. (As for All-Time Top 30, I'd like to suggest the number of people with the track on their favorites list being the criteria, with score determining ties - it may result in a rather static list, but the way I see it, that's what it was intended to be in the first place, not to showcase new talent - it's All-Time best after all.)