At 10/25/03 10:20 AM, TheJoe324 wrote:

At 10/25/03 10:16 AM, _lightning_ wrote: really sorry i tought olskoo said ones that he could edit posts too =(

He might have said he edited his own post, since mods can delete posts, they could delete their own then re-post it with corrections (so it COULD be considered editing.)

I HAVE thought about doing that, actually. heh.

So far, I've only deleted one of my posts, though. The reason? I was quoting someone who was text-spamming, and after I deleted their post (which was causing the topic to display incorrectly, by stretching out the message window)... I noticed the topic was still screwed up.

Of course, that was because the textspam was still in my quoted text of their original post. I dunno, I guess I thought the quoting process would have linewrapped the 150 characters in the spammage. So I deleted my post and reposted, with most of the spamming clipped and inserted a [x50] in place of it.

The Unofficial Newgrounds Top 50 Blammers List -- as of 10/31/2003 at 18:12 CDT

Congrats to:

Crono- on his promotion to Elite Guard Lieutenant General (6th)
thisisasignin on his promotion to Elite Guard Lieutenant General (5th)
gfoxcook on his promotion to Elite Guard Brigadier General (7th)
D0GMA on his promotion to Elite Guard Captain (17th)
chaotic1 on his promotion to Elite Guard Captain (18th)
YoinK on his promotion to Elite Guard Praporshchik (38th)
dustynickel on his promotion to Elite Guard Master Sergeant (61st) &
dl_Monk on his promotion to Elite Guard Sergeant Major (51st)

since the last update of the list.

Welcome to:

no one.

Farewell to:

no one.

DANGER ZONE:

Eh.. PZY still approaches, but dl_Monk's safe on both lists at #50 for now.

Greg's Notes:

A full 8 rankups on the blams list this time, up from 6 last update, which means both lists have 14 rankups each on the most recent 2 updates. Not too shabby. As I said in the other notes section, I spotted chaotic a single b/p point to get him to Captain. I wasn't gonna leave the poor bastard sitting at 12,499, even if it was true. #;-}>

You may check out the most recent Top 50 Protectors List by clicking the link I just posted. Enjoy comparing the lists to each other and to the Top 50 Combined B/P List. People on both the Top 50 Blammers List and the Top 50 Protectors List are denoted with ***.

List Column Legend

rank = this update's rank
prev = last update's rank
--
blams = approximate # of blams as of the update time
b2s% = blam-to-save % (i.e. ratio of blams to saves, or: blams/saves x 100)
b/p = approximate combined blam and protect points as of the update time
*** = on both the top 50 protectors and top 50 blammers lists
----
name = username (not current name in all cases due to some who change their names often)

rank / prev -- blams / b2s% / b/p ---- name
================================================
01 01 -- 22,443 304.11% 29,823 *** TheJoe324
02 02 -- 21,824 171.07% 34,581 *** ramagi
03 03 -- 21,773 194.78% 32,951 *** fixit
04 04 -- 17,267 265.44% 23,772 *** Crono-
05 05 -- 15,751 136.35% 27,303 *** RyoHahn
06 06 -- 14,754 167.43% 23,566 *** thisisasignin
07 07 -- 13,183 266.16% 18,136 *** NemesisM66
08 08 -- 11,277 203.59% 16,816 *** Stormwarden
09 09 -- 10,411 113.86% 19,555 *** gfoxcook
10 11 -- 09,979 134.20% 17,415 *** Recon_Rebel
11 10 -- 09,700 261.10% 13,415 *** adric
12 12 -- 09,025 327.82% 11,778 ---- courtday
13 13 -- 08,639 114.00% 16,217 *** Bila
14 14 -- 08,484 205.82% 12,606 *** D0GMA
15 15 -- 08,103 114.89% 15,156 *** DrMSM
16 16 -- 07,844 168.47% 12,500 *** chaotic1
17 17 -- 07,809 155.37% 12,835 *** XkwiziTOnE
18 18 -- 07,424 174.31% 11,683 *** Newgrundling
19 22 -- 07,370 121.82% 13,420 *** alexsmolik
20 23 -- 07,351 168.18% 11,722 *** stafffighter
21 20 -- 07,324 186.31% 11,255 *** Captain_Bob
22 19 -- 07,226 157.64% 11,810 *** helldoll81
23 21 -- 07,089 117.39% 13,128 *** poxpower
24 24 -- 07,033 262.33% 09,714 ---- nimmer
25 25 -- 06,822 178.40% 10,646 *** HAQnSPITT
26 26 -- 06,564 245.75% 09,235 ---- AdrenalineMJ
27 27 -- 06,442 263.80% 08,884 ---- Syme
28 28 -- 06,387 151.71% 10,597 *** RageVI
29 29 -- 06,006 184.74% 09,257 *** Denvish
30 31 -- 05,998 127.10% 10,717 *** leeboy105
31 34 -- 05,886 176.97% 09,212 *** staphita
32 30 -- 05,764 131.33% 10,153 *** Mr_Chuckles
33 33 -- 05,699 164.38% 09,166 *** b33r53x
34 35 -- 05,664 174.60% 08,908 *** _lightning_
35 32 -- 05,659 138.16% 09,755 *** HeRetiK
36 36 -- 05,488 120.83% 10,030 *** vuorimies
37 37 -- 05,446 270.81% 07,457 ---- GuineVir
38 40 -- 05,373 142.29% 09,149 *** biteme2514
39 38 -- 05,199 218.91% 07,574 ---- Hice
40 39 -- 05,186 474.47% 06,279 ---- Nostrant
41 42 -- 05,098 158.32% 08,318 *** YoinK
42 41 -- 05,061 226.24% 07,298 ---- DarkJaymz
43 44 -- 04,874 162.47% 07,874 *** Emperor_Pilaf
44 43 -- 04,789 180.17% 07,447 ---- Drimarki
45 45 -- 04,731 148.59% 07,915 *** PantherStrider
46 46 -- 04,613 145.66% 07,780 *** kevr1
47 47 -- 04,568 181.85% 07,080 ---- innphernoe
48 48 -- 04,463 283.37% 06,038 ---- dustynickel
49 49 -- 04,267 211.55% 06,284 ---- skum001
50 50 -- 04,203 144.09% 07,120 *** dl_Monk
================================================
rank / prev -- blams / b2s% / b/p ---- name

id liek to think that i would be on this list someday, but i have like half as many blams as any of the other people. it suxxors.

At 11/1/03 03:07 AM, BlGMANBRAINY wrote: id liek to think that i would be on this list someday, but i have like half as many blams as any of the other people. it suxxors.

around 2500 blams, eh? Yeah, it takes 4200 or so to get on now...

You're better off trying to get up to #50 so you can enter the official combined list. Once you do that, you may find your blams have come up enough that you can make a run at this list.

And, of course, there's always just continuing to climb the saves list. It's a worthwhile pursuit. #;-}>

thats sound advice my freind, and yes the protection list is indeed a worthy cause. i could get up it faster, but that would mean i would have to start being nice.

At 10/31/03 11:50 PM, gfoxcook wrote: rank / prev -- blams / b2s% / b/p ---- name
================================================
50 50 -- 04,203 144.09% 07,120 *** dl_Monk

Out of my own curiousity, I thought I'd do a bit of third party stat farming, just to see whether it's feasible for me to ever gun down #50 (no!)

Since gfoxcook started this list, the owner of the #50 spot (ie. not always dl_Monk) has increased by 859 blams over the course of 97 days. That's an increase of 8.856 blams per day, with local spikes as high as 18.6/day (not counting the difference between update 1 and 2, which was 29 but over two days - not really reliable) and low as 1.2/day.

So, assuming that these trends continue (and there's no reason to think they'd slow down for a significant period of time), if I could do 20 blams a day, I'd get on in 233 days, call it 8 months. But personally I'm doing nowhere near that rate.

Maybe by the time the Red Sox win the World Series I'll get on. Or be dead. But, in the words of Chris Pontius, "we're still trying" :-)

At 10/31/03 11:50 PM, gfoxcook wrote: 18 18 -- 07,424 174.31% 11,683 *** Newgrundling
19 22 -- 07,370 121.82% 13,420 *** alexsmolik

... That's for you passing over me while I was on summer vacations ! =D
Newgrundling ... I'm coming !

Eh.. I was in france (paris) for a week. No points for me. I'll pass monk in a week..

At 11/2/03 09:05 AM, -PZY- wrote: Eh.. I was in france (paris) for a week. No points for me. I'll pass monk in a week..

hey pzy your back =) did i forgot too deposit for you for a day? i can't remember if i rememberd every day

At 11/2/03 09:23 AM, _lightning_ wrote: hey pzy your back =) did i forgot too deposit for you for a day? i can't remember if i rememberd every day

I think so.. It dosen't matter anyway, cause I cannot go back in time and deposit again.
:::Chuckels:::
I could not deposit for 8 days. Yesterday I came back, but the NG server was down when I arrived. So I should have 90 exp (counting today too) more than last-last friday. 2805-90= 2815

You did... miss one day minimum.

At 11/2/03 10:06 AM, -PZY- wrote: You did... miss one day minimum.

sorry really buzy week for me and i got yesterday for you o well better luck next time =P

At 11/2/03 10:10 AM, _lightning_ wrote:
sorry really buzy week for me and i got yesterday for you o well better luck next time =P

Dosen't matter. You were willing to deposit and I thank you a lot for that. I am not quite sure, though. KoRnFreaker couldn't deposit all days so I asked you and you did your job good enough.

At 11/2/03 10:14 AM, -PZY- wrote: Dosen't matter. You were willing to deposit and I thank you a lot for that. I am not quite sure, though. KoRnFreaker couldn't deposit all days so I asked you and you did your job good enough.

k but i will get you some b/p points the next time too make up for it =)

At 11/2/03 07:29 AM, jonthomson wrote:

At 10/31/03 11:50 PM, gfoxcook wrote: rank / prev -- blams / b2s% / b/p ---- name
================================================
50 50 -- 04,203 144.09% 07,120 *** dl_Monk

Out of my own curiousity, I thought I'd do a bit of third party stat farming, just to see whether it's feasible for me to ever gun down #50 (no!)

... heh.

Since gfoxcook started this list, the owner of the #50 spot (ie. not always dl_Monk) has increased by 859 blams over the course of 97 days. That's an increase of 8.856 blams per day, with local spikes as high as 18.6/day (not counting the difference between update 1 and 2, which was 29 but over two days - not really reliable) and low as 1.2/day.

859 blams since late July, eh? hmmm... 3300something... seems like it was closer to 3500, but I'm probably just remembering where the bottom of the list was all August or something.

You should do the same for the #50 spot on the protects list. #;-}>

but anyway, things could change at any moment. Blam rates are more unstable than tech stock prices.

So, assuming that these trends continue (and there's no reason to think they'd slow down for a significant period of time), if I could do 20 blams a day, I'd get on in 233 days, call it 8 months. But personally I'm doing nowhere near that rate.

but you're always complaining you can't get any saves, and you got 83 saves in the time it took you to get 500 blams. Doesn't seem like 20 blams in a day would be that hard for you to do. In any event, once the 200 vote system's in place, perhaps then you'll have more hope for getting on any of the top 50 lists?

Maybe by the time the Red Sox win the World Series I'll get on. Or be dead. But, in the words of Chris Pontius, "we're still trying" :-)

No, it's fairly likely you'll be on this list before the Sox win the WS. #;-}>

At 11/2/03 10:06 AM, -PZY- wrote: I could not deposit for 8 days. Yesterday I came back, but the NG server was down when I arrived. So I should have 90 exp (counting today too) more than last-last friday. 2805-90= 2815

2805-90=2815?!

did you mean 2905-90=2815? Cause if you didn't, that equation didn't make any sense whatsoever. O_o

in any event, good to see you back and ready to start climbing again. There's finally some action at the bottom of the top 50 combined, and action on that list ALWAYS means SOME action on my two lists. Fun!

At 11/2/03 11:56 PM, gfoxcook wrote:

At 11/2/03 10:06 AM, -PZY- wrote:

2805-90=2815?!

did you mean 2905-90=2815? Cause if you didn't, that equation didn't make any sense whatsoever. O_o

I meant 2805-90= 2715

Umm... I was tired... and lightning didn't notice. funnn..

in any event, good to see you back and ready to start climbing again. There's finally some action at the bottom of the top 50 combined, and action on that list ALWAYS means SOME action on my two lists. Fun!

Yea, fun it is. I'll catch up to monk fast. But it will take long until i reach the save top 50 list.
Yesterday was quite insane. I got about 45 blams in 3-4 hours. Rock on! And about 20 saves too.
For my time zone, that's a lot! These hours were spread out over the enitre day, thoug. So a lot of sneak peaks once and then made it a lot. ;)
I'm talking crap now.
So, how has stuff been around here? Anything extraordinary? and when did thejoe become a mod?

At 11/3/03 12:44 PM, -PZY- wrote:

At 11/2/03 11:56 PM, gfoxcook wrote: did you mean 2905-90=2815? Cause if you didn't, that equation didn't make any sense whatsoever. O_o

I meant 2805-90= 2715

Umm... I was tired... and lightning didn't notice. funnn..

i did but i just didn't coment(?) on it.

At 11/3/03 12:44 PM, -PZY- wrote:

At 11/2/03 11:56 PM, gfoxcook wrote:

At 11/2/03 10:06 AM, -PZY- wrote:

2805-90=2815?!

did you mean 2905-90=2815? Cause if you didn't, that equation didn't make any sense whatsoever. O_o

I meant 2805-90= 2715

ahhhhh... close enough. #;-}>

Yea, fun it is. I'll catch up to monk fast. But it will take long until i reach the save top 50 list.

Good job on making it. I'm about to post the updates.

So, how has stuff been around here? Anything extraordinary? and when did thejoe become a mod?

Uhhh... a couple weeks ago, I guess. About a week after Captain Bob did, and a couple weeks after I did. Oh wait, I remember, it was a few days before Halloween, I noticed he was the 13th mod, and that was just in time for the one holiday that 13 is a good number for, speaking from a superstitious POV. heh. so maybe October 29th or so.

At 11/3/03 01:29 PM, _lightning_ wrote:

At 11/3/03 12:44 PM, -PZY- wrote: I meant 2805-90= 2715

Umm... I was tired... and lightning didn't notice. funnn..

i did but i just didn't coment(?) on it.

Comment.

And ahhhhhh. That explains it... YET AGAIN. Okay. #;-}>

At 10/24/03 12:43 PM, _lightning_ wrote:

At 10/24/03 08:34 AM, -PZY- wrote: Then we are in trouble. Right? RIGHT??
Would it be a ban? BTW, can you delete posts, or only images?

he can delet them and edit them even =)

I wish I could ADD them without posting.

Second freakin' post for this account, and all just so I can get the damned update to be all on one page, and not tucked away at the bottom of page 15. Okay. Mission accomplished.

Back to you, gfox!

The Unofficial Newgrounds Top 50 Blammers List -- as of 11/08/2003 at 19:36 CDT

Congrats to:

TheJoe324 on his promotion to Elite Guard Supreme Commander (3rd)
Recon_Rebel on his promotion to Elite Guard Colonel (9th)
Denvish on his promotion to Elite Guard Second Lieutenant (31st) &
Emperor_Pilaf on his promotion to Elite Guard Praporshchik (39th)

since the last update of the list.

List Stats:

The Top 50 Blammers currently have 414,750 blams
The Top 50 Blammers currently have 234,631 saves
The Top 50 Blammers currently have 649,381 combined b/p

176.77% is the Top 50 Blammers' overall blam-to-save %
63.87% of the Top 50 Blammers' combined b/p are blams

Welcome to:

Scaper-X, who made a fantastic leap to #49 and now has 150 more blams than the #50 did last update
PZY, who finished off the guy Scaper pushed down to #50 (that would be, of course, dl_Monk) in dramatic fashion

Farewell to:

dl_Monk, whose run at #50 on both lists has ended. He actually passed #49 from last update on BOTH lists. But unlike the saves list, that wasn't enough to save him here, and he falls off at #51
skum001, who is FINALLY off all three top 50 lists, a full 11 months after leaving NG. It took awhile, but we finally did it. Hallelujah!

DANGER ZONE:

I saw PZY coming, but I thought Scaper might be a bit later. Boy was I wrong. They both sit at the bottom of the list since dustynickel and innphernoe and all the rest are quite a bit above, but in entering the list, they've raised the necessary mark quite higher than the 4200 blams it was last update. I see great things in their future, like say the top 50 combined list perhaps? #;-}> In any event, no one's in any further danger any time soon on this list unless dl_Monk, having fallen off this one and, realising he's about to fall off the saves list as well, decides to mount a fullscale b/p campaign.... we shall see.

Greg's Notes:

As you may have noticed up there, I've introduced a new feature to my addendums. It was inspired by jon's Top Reviewers List, in case you were wondering. I believe I posted some stats on total blams/saves from my lists a few weeks ago in his topic and it was fun and all, but I just now thought "hey, it's also informational. Why not?" #;-}>

A rather puny 4 rankups was all the top 50 blammers could manage this update, after 8 and 6 rankups the last two update. Kinda disappointing, but oh well. You win some, you lose some. I predict a reversal of rankup fortune by the next update, but you guys who are only on this list and not on the saves list have got to put in some work if that's to happen. #;-}>

As mentioned on the saves list, TheJoe has become the 1st male Supreme Commander (ramagi was the 1st female and fixit was the 1st robot). Congrats a fourth time! #;-}>

You may check out the most recent Top 50 Protectors List by clicking the link I just posted. Enjoy comparing the lists to each other and to the Top 50 Combined B/P List. People on both the Top 50 Blammers List and the Top 50 Protectors List are denoted with ***.

List Column Legend

rank = this update's rank
prev = last update's rank
--
blams = approximate # of blams as of the update time
b2s% = blam-to-save % (i.e. ratio of blams to saves, or: blams/saves x 100)
b/p = approximate combined blam and protect points as of the update time
*** = on both the top 50 protectors and top 50 blammers lists
----
name = username (not current name in all cases due to some who change their names often)

rank / prev -- blams / b2s% / b/p ---- name
================================================
01 01 -- 22,602 304.04% 30,036 *** TheJoe324
02 03 -- 22,248 195.16% 33,648 *** fixit
03 02 -- 22,042 171.25% 34,913 *** ramagi
04 04 -- 17,692 264.22% 24,388 *** Crono-
05 05 -- 15,853 136.10% 27,501 *** RyoHahn
06 06 -- 14,756 167.38% 23,572 *** thisisasignin
07 07 -- 13,427 265.30% 18,488 *** NemesisM66
08 08 -- 11,346 202.64% 16,945 *** Stormwarden
09 09 -- 10,631 113.47% 20,000 *** gfoxcook
10 10 -- 10,144 134.06% 17,711 *** Recon_Rebel
11 11 -- 09,700 261.03% 13,416 *** adric
12 12 -- 09,202 325.16% 12,032 ---- courtday
13 13 -- 08,808 113.70% 16,555 *** Bila
14 14 -- 08,641 206.08% 12,834 *** D0GMA
15 15 -- 08,198 114.80% 15,339 *** DrMSM
16 17 -- 07,999 155.53% 13,142 *** XkwiziTOnE
17 16 -- 07,957 168.69% 12,674 *** chaotic1
18 20 -- 07,685 169.53% 12,218 *** stafffighter
19 19 -- 07,559 122.99% 13,705 *** alexsmolik
20 21 -- 07,469 186.77% 11,468 *** Captain_Bob
21 18 -- 07,451 174.21% 11,728 *** Newgrundling
22 22 -- 07,231 157.23% 11,830 *** helldoll81
23 24 -- 07,100 261.80% 09,812 ---- nimmer
24 23 -- 07,089 117.39% 13,128 *** poxpower
25 25 -- 06,828 178.23% 10,659 *** HAQnSPITT
26 26 -- 06,564 245.75% 09,235 ---- AdrenalineMJ
27 27 -- 06,516 263.38% 08,990 ---- Syme
28 28 -- 06,433 151.86% 10,669 *** RageVI
29 29 -- 06,181 184.56% 09,530 *** Denvish
30 30 -- 06,099 127.17% 10,895 *** leeboy105
31 31 -- 06,003 177.60% 09,383 *** staphita
32 34 -- 05,824 176.11% 09,131 *** _lightning_
33 33 -- 05,777 164.63% 09,286 *** _altr_
34 32 -- 05,764 131.33% 10,153 *** Mr_Chuckles
35 35 -- 05,661 138.14% 09,759 *** HeRetiK
36 38 -- 05,508 143.29% 09,352 *** biteme2514
37 36 -- 05,490 120.53% 10,045 *** vuorimies
38 37 -- 05,446 270.81% 07,457 ---- GuineVir
39 41 -- 05,349 159.62% 08,700 *** YoinK
40 39 -- 05,215 218.66% 07,600 ---- Hice
41 40 -- 05,197 473.75% 06,294 ---- Nostrant
42 43 -- 05,090 163.72% 08,199 *** Emperor_Pilaf
43 42 -- 05,065 226.42% 07,302 ---- DarkJaymz
44 44 -- 04,789 180.17% 07,447 ---- Drimarki
45 45 -- 04,731 148.59% 07,915 *** PantherStrider
46 46 -- 04,614 145.60% 07,783 *** kevr1
47 47 -- 04,581 182.07% 07,097 ---- innphernoe
48 48 -- 04,567 275.29% 06,226 ---- dustynickel
49 51 -- 04,348 207.15% 06,447 ---- Scaper-X
50 52 -- 04,280 173.70% 06,744 ---- PZY
================================================
rank / prev -- blams / b2s% / b/p ---- name

I finished off dl_Monk very close.. I had 4279 and he had 4278. He he... but I stayed upp last night just to beat him, so no coincidence (?) here!

Anyways, I didn't see scaper pushing up, so i expected to leap into a solid #49. But congrats to scaper for pushing me down. I haven't got any points today, because I was at a friends's house until now (I had dinner..) . My time zone is 6 hours before the NG time.

But here I am, and no way I'm going down into the endless ranks of the people not in this list. And are there any fast moving blammers struggeling to reach the top 50?

Say Word?! I just cracked 8,000 Blams.......Wow there was alot of crappy movies that needed exiting!

At 11/9/03 12:36 PM, XkwiziTOnE wrote: Say Word?! I just cracked 8,000 Blams.......Wow there was alot of crappy movies that needed exiting!

Congrats! Too bad that wasn't listed in the update. Meh..

At 11/9/03 12:31 PM, -PZY- wrote: I finished off dl_Monk very close.. I had 4279 and he had 4278. He he... but I stayed upp last night just to beat him, so no coincidence (?) here!

Anyways, I didn't see scaper pushing up, so i expected to leap into a solid #49. But congrats to scaper for pushing me down. I haven't got any points today, because I was at a friends's house until now (I had dinner..) . My time zone is 6 hours before the NG time.

Good job, guys. Nice to see you and Scaper make the list. Anyway, yeah, I know. You JUST beat dl_Monk off the list in time for the update. Oh, and yeah, you were at 4,279. But I changed it to 4,280 for a reason I think you can see below:

49 51 -- 04,348 207.15% 06,447 ---- Scaper-X
50 52 -- 04,280 173.70% 06,744 ---- PZY

Scaper had 6,447 total points, and you had 6,743. The potential to make it look really cool with a 6,744 instead was too great, so I bumped ya one.

But here I am, and no way I'm going down into the endless ranks of the people not in this list. And are there any fast moving blammers struggeling to reach the top 50?

Like my update said, man:

"In any event, no one's in any further danger any time soon on this list unless dl_Monk, having fallen off this one and, realising he's about to fall off the saves list as well, decides to mount a fullscale b/p campaign.... we shall see."

At 11/9/03 12:51 PM, -PZY- wrote:

At 11/9/03 12:36 PM, XkwiziTOnE wrote: Say Word?! I just cracked 8,000 Blams.......Wow there was alot of crappy movies that needed exiting!

Congrats! Too bad that wasn't listed in the update. Meh..

Yeah, I coulda spotted X a blam as well, but there's nothing wrong with 7,999. In fact, it guarantees that you're the king of the 7,000s. #;-}>

Anyway, again, as I just said over in the saves list:

what did everyone think of the new List Stats? I haven't heard one word about 'em. :(

Feedback! Please!

At 11/9/03 05:54 PM, gfoxcook wrote: Anyway, again, as I just said over in the saves list:

what did everyone think of the new List Stats? I haven't heard one word about 'em. :(

Feedback! Please!

and.... I STILL haven't heard anything about the new List Stats. But then again, only two people have replied since the update in this topic, and only two other people have replied since the update in the other list topic. Well, anyway, you four guys, or others, if you didn't notice the stats in the update because they were in the middle or something, that counts as feedback. I'm looking, IOW, for reaction to the stats, whether or not they're helpful/interesting, and whether they're in the right place on the update or should be moved/reformatted/etc. Feedback, IOW! #;-}> Last chance to have your say:

List Stats:

The Top 50 Blammers currently have 414,750 blams
The Top 50 Blammers currently have 234,631 saves
The Top 50 Blammers currently have 649,381 combined b/p

176.77% is the Top 50 Blammers' overall blam-to-save %
63.87% of the Top 50 Blammers' combined b/p are blams

Well, gfox, I'm sorry on your behalf. I'm kinda sad myself that the intrest for this list isn't much, well, until now. It's kinda annyoing that when I'm finally there no one responds or even says congrats to me. Well, that's life. And well, I like to say well.

And I'm catching up on Scaper. Only about 60 more to go now. That's two days, but I never know how fast scaper will move. Still, the excitement is here. Like me and impetus (who are not much at NG nowadays). Look's like Scaper is my arch enemy while talking B/P.

At 11/10/03 12:16 PM, gfoxcook wrote: List Stats:

The Top 50 Blammers currently have 414,750 blams
The Top 50 Blammers currently have 234,631 saves
The Top 50 Blammers currently have 649,381 combined b/p

176.77% is the Top 50 Blammers' overall blam-to-save %
63.87% of the Top 50 Blammers' combined b/p are blams

The list statistics are pretty interesting i suppose. Good addition to the current blammers list, so i think you should continue to publish them.