At 6/8/03 06:38 PM, lord_minotaur wrote: i wonder what th3e next 30 levels are going to have an affect.

well if they're going to ad new levels i don't think they will goive us more voting power becouse some people would have a voting power of 26 then and the people wth a voting power of 1.94 wouldn't really like that =P

At 6/8/03 07:23 PM, _lightning_ wrote:

At 6/8/03 06:38 PM, lord_minotaur wrote: i wonder what th3e next 30 levels are going to have an affect.

well if they're going to ad new levels i don't think they will goive us more voting power becouse some people would have a voting power of 26 then and the people wth a voting power of 1.94 wouldn't really like that =P

If the people who had a voting power of 13 (i.e. the ones not too far below humantarget and his 15 VP) suddenly have 26 when the number of levels doubles, then won't the people with 1.94 suddenly have 3.88, and thus not really want to complain?

At 6/8/03 09:51 PM, gfoxcook wrote: If the people who had a voting power of 13 (i.e. the ones not too far below humantarget and his 15 VP) suddenly have 26 when the number of levels doubles, then won't the people with 1.94 suddenly have 3.88, and thus not really want to complain?

yes but would be if it doubles that 10*2=20 = the ranks extra would bea voting power of 32 so i don't think they'll give any one a voting power of 32 =)

At 6/9/03 03:56 AM, _lightning_ wrote:

At 6/8/03 09:51 PM, gfoxcook wrote: If the people who had a voting power of 13 (i.e. the ones not too far below humantarget and his 15 VP) suddenly have 26 when the number of levels doubles, then won't the people with 1.94 suddenly have 3.88, and thus not really want to complain?

yes but would be if it doubles that 10*2=20 = the ranks extra would bea voting power of 32 so i don't think they'll give any one a voting power of 32 =)

... would be if it doubles that 10*2=20 = the ranks extra...

man, I normally understand you when other people go "HUH?!" to a post of yours, but I must admit I have been defeated this time.

So I'll just reply to the 32 voting power part. You're probably right. 16 VP is high enough, after all. I think maybe 20 would be okay, but no higher than 20...

At 6/9/03 11:23 AM, gfoxcook wrote: man, I normally understand you when other people go "HUH?!" to a post of yours, but I must admit I have been defeated this time.

well it's the voting power of what the level 30 could have that's 10 if they would ad 30 more levels like they said and ad more voting power the level 60 would have a voting power of 20 with the 60% if he would get the highest rank it would be come a voting power of 32 =)

At 6/9/03 12:26 PM, _lightning_ wrote:

At 6/9/03 11:23 AM, gfoxcook wrote: man, I normally understand you when other people go "HUH?!" to a post of yours, but I must admit I have been defeated this time.

well it's the voting power of what the level 30 could have that's 10 if they would ad 30 more levels like they said and ad more voting power the level 60 would have a voting power of 20 with the 60% if he would get the highest rank it would be come a voting power of 32 =)

it was the "ranks extra" part I didn't understand. Yeah, I know that 10 is the current max, and 60% makes it 16, and thus 32 is the double of that max. It wasn't the numbers I didn't get, it was your WORDS between the numbers. #;-}>

At 6/9/03 02:14 PM, gfoxcook wrote: it was the "ranks extra" part I didn't understand. Yeah, I know that 10 is the current max, and 60% makes it 16, and thus 32 is the double of that max. It wasn't the numbers I didn't get, it was your WORDS between the numbers. #;-}>

well i hope you get it now =)

At 6/9/03 02:20 PM, _lightning_ wrote:

At 6/9/03 02:14 PM, gfoxcook wrote: it was the "ranks extra" part I didn't understand. Yeah, I know that 10 is the current max, and 60% makes it 16, and thus 32 is the double of that max. It wasn't the numbers I didn't get, it was your WORDS between the numbers. #;-}>

well i hope you get it now =)

I got the overall message you were saying from the very start, man. It was the particulars. Those I still don't get. But let me try one last time:

"yes but would be if it doubles that 10*2=20 = the ranks extra would bea voting power of 32 so i don't think they'll give any one a voting power of 32 =)"

attempted translation:

Yes, but if it were to be doubled, then the maximum base voting power would double from 10 to 20. The blam/protect max bonus would raise the voting power to 32. But I don't think they'll give anyone a voting power of 32.

There. I think that's it. Let me know. #;-}>

When do you think you're going to update that list? I got a few more Saves and now I think I might be on it. Actually, give me another day before you update it. I want to make sure I'm on it first... Hehehe...

At 6/10/03 01:47 AM, biteme2514 wrote: When do you think you're going to update that list? I got a few more Saves and now I think I might be on it.

Just updated it, actually. What a nice coincidence, eh?

Actually, give me another day before you update it. I want to make sure I'm on it first... Hehehe...

er... sorry about that, too late, already updated! heheh, be careful what you wish for, ye of the 6666 posts!

You're about... er... 15 saves from being in the 50 slot. You'll be on the next list if you don't stop gettin' those protects, so get to it! hup hup!

Okay, if I make one more post before I put the list on, it'll be at the top of page 9, so let me put THIS post here instead of after the list, as I was going to do (a little test post to go along with the list this time, see how it goes):

Congrats to:

fixit on his promotion to Elite Guard Lieutenant Colonel
poxpower on his promotion to Elite Guard Captain
gfoxcook on his promotion to Elite Guard Second Lieutenant
helldoll81 on her promotion to Elite Guard First Lieutenant
Captain_Bob on his promotion to Elite Guard Praporshchik &
DarkJaymz on his promotion to Elite Guard Sergeant Major

since the last update of the list.

Lightning, I'm sure you'll be happy to know you moved up a couple slots. Enjoy. #;-}>

At 6/5/03 01:06 PM, gfoxcook wrote:

At 6/1/03 03:31 AM, gfoxcook wrote:

At 5/26/03 01:10 AM, gfoxcook wrote:

At 5/19/03 07:30 AM, gfoxcook wrote:

At 5/13/03 02:10 AM, gfoxcook wrote:

At 5/5/03 03:18 AM, gfoxcook wrote: protections rank, number, name -- as of 05/05/2003 at 01:11 CDT

protections rank, number, name -- as of 05/12/2003 at 23:45 CDT

protections rank, number, name -- as of 05/19/2003 at 06:30 CDT

protections rank, number, name -- as of 05/25/2003 at 22:55 CDT

protections rank, number, name -- as of 06/01/2003 at 01:23 CDT

protections rank, number, name -- as of 06/05/2003 at 11:21 CDT

protections rank, number, name -- as of 06/10/2003 at 04:36 CDT
01 10,537 ramagi
02 9,720 RyoHahn
03 6,519 fixit
04 6,390 thisisasignin
05 6,018 DrMSM
06 5,782 poxpower
07 5,516 Bila
08 5,447 Recon_Rebel
09 5,100 gfoxcook
10 4,979 Stormwarden
11 4,596 TheJoe324
12 4,508 NemesisM66
13 4,191 helldoll81
14 4,158 vuorimies
15 4,092 alexsmolik
16 3,972 HeRetiK
17 3,898 Mr_Chuckles
18 3,887 Toocool100
19 3,710 HAQnSPITT
20 3,643 chaotic1
21 3,422 CTTcrew_l2edfoX
22 3,367 the_phantom_spancker
23 3,321 XwaynecoltX
24 3,239 leeboy105
25 3,215 _altr_
26 3,192 Ppk3000
27 3,159 kevr1
28 3,147 XkwiziTOnE
29 3,052 Newgrundling
30 3,036 Crono-
31 2,994 Dark00Stir-fry
32 2,966 agent66
33 2,903 Captain_Bob
34 2,889 _redruM_
35 2,881 Mystboy
36 2,869 staphita
37 2,865 Mike277
38 2,739 RageVI
39 2,715 Bigmanbrainy
40 2,658 Drimarki
41 2,623 arrows_eleven
42 2,574 format
43 2,509 GSX_Boy
44 2,467 YoinK_The_Destroyer
45 2,450 lordfril
46 2,355 _lightning_
47 2,340 innphernoe
48 2,327 Hice
49 2,308 nimmer
50 2,165 DarkJaymz

the next time you post the list i will have passed Mr_Chuckles, however im not so sure about HeRetiK. i hope i can do it, go me!

At 6/10/03 06:16 AM, gfoxcook wrote: Lightning, I'm sure you'll be happy to know you moved up a couple slots. Enjoy. #;-}>

yep í sure are i even getting closer too my b/s number =)

I should probably post this in the voting power thread, but i'm gonna do it here anyway. NGling, you forgot me on your list, my voting power is 7.06

At 6/10/03 01:22 PM, leeboy105 wrote: I should probably post this in the voting power thread, but i'm gonna do it here anyway. NGling, you forgot me on your list, my voting power is 7.06

you are on the updated list on the second page of that thread =)

At 6/10/03 10:07 AM, Toocool100 wrote: the next time you post the list i will have passed Mr_Chuckles, however im not so sure about HeRetiK. i hope i can do it, go me!

You'll do fine. You'll probably be the next person to 4000 saves. Heretik doesn't move too fast (certainly not as fast as Mr_Chuckles).

At 6/10/03 10:26 AM, _lightning_ wrote:

At 6/10/03 06:16 AM, gfoxcook wrote: Lightning, I'm sure you'll be happy to know you moved up a couple slots. Enjoy. #;-}>

yep í sure are i even getting closer too my b/s number =)

Yeah, that's cool. I've always been ahead on my save rank compared to my b/p rank. Soon you will be as well.

Right now my blams are still going faster than my saves, though. After months of working my saves up past 600 ahead, 800 ahead, 1000 ahead, almost up to 1100 ahead of my blams, now they're back down to about 700 apart. It's wild.

Hmmm WOohoo #30 for me... although i think i woulda been alot higher if i didnt stop voting on movies for a few months... :(

At 6/10/03 07:22 PM, Crono- wrote: Hmmm WOohoo #30 for me... although i think i woulda been alot higher if i didnt stop voting on movies for a few months... :(

You'd also be higher if it weren't for there being so much crap on the portal.

As would I. I can't believe I've gotten barely 100 saves in 6 days. I used to get 300 saves in 6 days. (sigh)

At 6/10/03 07:34 PM, gfoxcook wrote: You'd also be higher if it weren't for there being so much crap on the portal.

As would I. I can't believe I've gotten barely 100 saves in 6 days. I used to get 300 saves in 6 days. (sigh)

Yea i know its crazy I know many people are puttin a hurtin on the 0 or 1 button than the 2,3,4 or 5 - its gonna need surgery soon.......

At 6/10/03 10:07 AM, Toocool100 wrote: the next time you post the list i will have passed Mr_Chuckles, however im not so sure about HeRetiK. i hope i can do it, go me!

Interesting. I recently passed Mr_Chuckles in number of posts. I kicked him out of the #7 spot on format's Top 50 BBS Posters list but you can't see that yet because format has yet to update the list. It's a nice page though...

At 6/10/03 09:28 PM, biteme2514 wrote: Interesting. I recently passed Mr_Chuckles in number of posts. I kicked him out of the #7 spot on format's Top 50 BBS Posters list but you can't see that yet because format has yet to update the list. It's a nice page though...

how many posts a day do you have now?? i don't see you post as much as you use too

At 6/11/03 03:59 PM, _lightning_ wrote: how many posts a day do you have now?? i don't see you post as much as you use too

Still about 60. I just don't post a lot in General anymore. I've been a little more busy running the OCP in the Clubs & Crews forum and there's also a lot of stuff I've been doing in my real life so I haven't had too much time to blow on the BBS. I still post more than a lot of people though...

Check this out though. We hit this last night...

At 6/11/03 09:33 PM, biteme2514 wrote: Check this out though. We hit this last night...

damn that thread is getting bigger then the level up thread =S

At 6/12/03 09:43 AM, _lightning_ wrote:

At 6/11/03 09:33 PM, biteme2514 wrote: Check this out though. We hit this last night...

damn that thread is getting bigger then the level up thread =S

Well they are 'Obsessive Compulsive' posters so the size of the thread would increase at a phenomenal rate.

At 6/12/03 01:23 PM, leeboy105 wrote: Well they are 'Obsessive Compulsive' posters so the size of the thread would increase at a phenomenal rate.

yes but they don't have that many mambers. right?

At 6/12/03 02:08 PM, _lightning_ wrote:

At 6/12/03 01:23 PM, leeboy105 wrote: Well they are 'Obsessive Compulsive' posters so the size of the thread would increase at a phenomenal rate.

yes but they don't have that many mambers. right?

That is something i don't know.

At 6/12/03 02:08 PM, _lightning_ wrote: yes but they don't have that many mambers. right?

Less than 50 and about 30 of them aren't even active users anymore...

At 6/12/03 08:04 PM, biteme2514 wrote:

At 6/12/03 02:08 PM, _lightning_ wrote: yes but they don't have that many mambers. right?

Less than 50 and about 30 of them aren't even active users anymore...

really i thought you only had like 12 members =S

At 6/13/03 03:04 PM, _lightning_ wrote: really i thought you only had like 12 members =S

We have less than twelve that post regularly anyways. I just don't like turning away new members...