At 7/1/06 05:07 PM, electricfreak wrote: It let me too, that's because I'm in the top 2000 active users right?
Yes, I screwed up thinking that the panel of judges was just that, the top 2000 users, but I was wrong.
There's complications with creating a top 2000 active users list because I have to figure out if there's vagrants without profiles and it's nearly impossible to test how accurate it would be since I can't tell who's actually on the list. Like with my current program, I can click on people's profiles and confirm that it's working well. With the top 2000 active users, I may end up with people on the list who aren't supposed to be there or people who are supposed to be there but didn't make it. Since I have no way of telling whether it is correct or not, it would be a list based somewhat on assumption.
I may try and give a shot though at the end of this month. I've started increasing the number of people I'm tracking where before I used to not care about depositers beyond the top 3000, so I may be able to create a top 2000 active users list.