At 4/1/18 02:31 PM, NekoMika wrote: Stance still stands but given they aren't even here anymore, meh.

Ah, good to know!

Thank you auz it's always a pleasure to see an update and you made it extra special this time but still nice to see

I dropped off on some numbers this time around me and my girlfriend have been doing some special updates ourselves ha. But anyways thanks for another fantastic update

And congrats to everyone as always

@cyberdevil what in the world is going on there is some extra stuff on our tagging lol. Must be that blue thing lol. Funny stuff

~X~

At 4/1/18 06:39 PM, XwaynecoltX wrote: @cyberdevil what in the world is going on there is some extra stuff on our tagging lol. Must be that blue thing lol. Funny stuff

lol yeah, yesterday was a special day. :) Been saving screencaps like crazy; eternalizing the moments...

At 4/1/18 11:55 AM, Auz wrote:
.#_ || .Total. ||Game||.Movie.||Audio|| .Art. || .Diff. || Name
16) || 03700 || 2050 || 00335 || 0315 || 1000 || +007 || @DoctorStrongbad

Seven reviews may not sound like much, but I am happy that I gained them.

At 4/2/18 09:45 PM, RightTime wrote: Left my first two reviews today. Now I just need to leave another 1,301 reviews give or take to make it on the list. That is going to take a very long time.

Seems like that back when I first started I wrote 6 reviews my first ever and well they do ad up

~X~

At 4/2/18 09:45 PM, RightTime wrote: Left my first two reviews today. Now I just need to leave another 1,301 reviews give or take to make it on the list. That is going to take a very long time.

Nice. :D Surprised nobody's said yet that going by possible monthly gains lately you could make your way pretty high onto the list in just a few months. ;) Though definitely is a lot easier when you don't think so much about it, just write when you can and want to, depending on spare moment amounts it adds up pretty quick.

At 4/1/18 02:05 PM, NekoMika wrote:

At 4/1/18 11:55 AM, Auz wrote: Newcomers: @EDM364

They go by @ADR3-N now.

That's weird. I've been on the list for some months now. Is this a glitch?

... Yep, definitely a glitch. Looks like I'm taking up 2 slots on the list.

At 4/4/18 12:25 AM, ADR3-N wrote: That's weird. I've been on the list for some months now. Is this a glitch?
... Yep, definitely a glitch. Looks like I'm taking up 2 slots on the list.

Nice work catching that glitch. You must be very important if you are on the list twice. ;)

At 4/4/18 02:44 PM, DoctorStrongbad wrote: Nice work catching that glitch. You must be very important if you are on the list twice. ;)

It could possibly be because I've set my old username to redirect to my new page. @byteslinger?

At 4/5/18 08:20 AM, NekoMika wrote: Anytime a user changes their name, the old name will always redirect to the new name.

By default indeed, though it is a choice. ;)

The way the crawler works though, I think, is that it doesn't notice if it's redirected or not, and as such fetches stats even for users who have had their names changed - as long as those names redirect. If it's not all too taxing on resources might be good with a dupe check though. Before, it used to be up to each list maintainer to notice these things, but now that it's a collective database...

At 4/5/18 02:41 AM, ADR3-N wrote:

At 4/4/18 02:44 PM, DoctorStrongbad wrote: Nice work catching that glitch. You must be very important if you are on the list twice. ;)

It could possibly be because I've set my old username to redirect to my new page. @byteslinger?

Yup. The renamer will only change the name in the database if (a) the new named account exists and (b) the old name no longer exists. Since you're redirecting EDM364 to @ADR3-N, the program determines that in step (b) it DOES exist, and therefore cannot be renamed - it's already taken.

I can do the change manually in the database later this evening when I return back to the home office.

@ADR3-N, @CyberDevil:

I cleaned up the database in NGStats so that the only ID in use is now 'adr3-n'; any history for 'edm364' has been renamed to the new account.

I'm going to have to make the main page analyzer a bit smarter when it comes to the internal user IDs and duplicate processing. The redirects are something new - and not properly handled yet.

In the meantime, if anyone has renamed their account AND has a redirect, please let me know both the old and new account names so I can patch the file ASAP. Thanks!

At 4/5/18 09:25 PM, byteslinger wrote: @ADR3-N, @CyberDevil:

I cleaned up the database in NGStats so that the only ID in use is now 'adr3-n'; any history for 'edm364' has been renamed to the new account.

Thanks! Although now @Auz may have to go through another list. I feel crappy for bumping people down a notch. Might also want to look at the StaticSkull account that also randomly popped up in the newcomers. @NekoMika may be able to check and see.

Here's the May 2018 update!

Many thanks to @byteslinger for keeping the Automated User List Tools running despite the recent lay-out changes to NG profiles.

At 4/6/18 01:20 AM, ADR3-N wrote:

At 4/5/18 09:25 PM, byteslinger wrote: @ADR3-N, @CyberDevil:

I cleaned up the database in NGStats so that the only ID in use is now 'adr3-n'; any history for 'edm364' has been renamed to the new account.

Thanks! Although now @Auz may have to go through another list. I feel crappy for bumping people down a notch. Might also want to look at the StaticSkull account that also randomly popped up in the newcomers. @NekoMika may be able to check and see.

I think StaticSkull is a legit one.

@byteslinger I don't think the issue with ADR3-N/EDM364 has been entirely resolved yet as the Stat Management tool still lists them separately.

Also, I've also been having some issues with users not showing up on the reviewers list while they are included in the database according to the User Tools page. Specifically these are mait192 and LucidShadowDreamer.

I'm unsure what the issue might be and if there's any easy way to fix it. If it's too much trouble I'm fine with adding them manually though.

----

Update #228 (2 May 2018)

Newcomers: -
Leavers: -

Top Gainers:
+1098 - @XwaynecoltX
+0571 - @Cyberdevil
+0119 - @Ericho
+0077 - @TaintedLogic
+0051 - @ADR3-N

.#_ || .Total. ||Game||.Movie.||Audio|| .Art. || .Diff. || Name
01) || 26597 || 4988 || 16036 || 2169 || 3404 || +1098 || @XwaynecoltX
02) || 22881 || 4507 || 11047 || 2616 || 4711 || +0571 || @Cyberdevil
03) || 18577 || 6510 || 08785 || 1365 || 1917 || +0119 || @Ericho
04) || 14956 || 3585 || 11371 || 0000 || 0000 || +0000 || @KWAS71KCK
05) || 10262 || 1445 || 07146 || 1614 || 0057 || .-0006 || @ViceFullbuster
06) || 10107 || 1516 || 05523 || 1333 || 1735 || +0036 || @Wegra
07) || 06092 || 0451 || 01274 || 2965 || 1402 || .-0006 || @NekoMika
08) || 05935 || 1981 || 03755 || 0195 || 0004 || +0000 || @FattyWhale
09) || 05225 || 1115 || 03896 || 0211 || 0003 || +0001 || @YoinK
10) || 04847 || 1167 || 03654 || 0026 || 0000 || +0002 || @MI4-REAL-2001
11) || 04319 || 0569 || 03750 || 0000 || 0000 || +0000 || @RyanAn
12) || 04186 || 0794 || 03316 || 0076 || 0000 || +0000 || @Hamy-jamy
13) || 04002 || 0783 || 03211 || 0008 || 0000 || +0000 || @M-A-R-C-U-S
14) || 03989 || 0376 || 03240 || 0034 || 0339 || +0012 || @Chris-the-stick2
15) || 03770 || 0094 || 03543 || 0066 || 0067 || +0011 || @09CArventos
16) || 03720 || 2065 || 00340 || 0315 || 1000 || +0020 || @DoctorStrongbad
17) || 03614 || 0533 || 01565 || 1201 || 0315 || +0000 || @Coop
18) || 03489 || 1027 || 01675 || 0054 || 0733 || +0013 || @Exedor
19) || 03239 || 0666 || 02568 || 0005 || 0000 || +0000 || @j00bie
20) || 03195 || 0030 || 00167 || 2990 || 0008 || +0000 || @wyldfyre1
21) || 03012 || 1055 || 01944 || 0001 || 0012 || .-0001 || @BlackKitsune42
22) || 02950 || 0766 || 01877 || 0303 || 0004 || +0000 || @Bezman
23) || 02902 || 0552 || 00758 || 0965 || 0627 || .-0001 || @food123
24) || 02830 || 0174 || 00754 || 0235 || 1667 || .-0020 || @StaticSkull
25) || 02801 || 0009 || 00054 || 2732 || 0006 || +0000 || @Bad-Man-Incorporated
26) || 02721 || 0273 || 00738 || 1535 || 0175 || +0000 || @Haggard
27) || 02673 || 0816 || 01840 || 0014 || 0003 || +0000 || @el-syd
28) || 02569 || 0080 || 00260 || 0028 || 2201 || +0000 || @SileNt-Sam
29) || 02500 || 0629 || 01406 || 0390 || 0075 || +0000 || @sixflab
30) || 02440 || 0612 || 01708 || 0085 || 0035 || +0000 || @JamesKnox
31) || 02394 || 0007 || 00052 || 2312 || 0023 || +0077 || @TaintedLogic 1
32) || 02346 || 0306 || 01245 || 0403 || 0392 || +0006 || @MindChamber -1
33) || 02299 || 0629 || 00787 || 0532 || 0351 || +0000 || @Faires
34) || 02223 || 0320 || 00723 || 1030 || 0150 || .-0001 || @Fro
35) || 02191 || 0474 || 01709 || 0004 || 0004 || +0000 || @Violet-AIM
36) || 02158 || 0202 || 00764 || 0216 || 0976 || +0000 || @googletoper
37) || 02132 || 0298 || 01232 || 0195 || 0407 || +0000 || @metroidfannumber1
38) || 02130 || 0202 || 00451 || 1334 || 0143 || +0051 || @ADR3-N 1
39) || 02101 || 0159 || 00712 || 0139 || 1091 || +0009 || @VicariousE -1
40) || 02062 || 0380 || 01480 || 0120 || 0082 || +0001 || @tyler2513
41) || 02055 || 0574 || 00628 || 0745 || 0108 || +0002 || @kwing
42) || 01999 || 0818 || 01074 || 0021 || 0086 || +0000 || @Dew
43) || 01955 || 0043 || 01390 || 0108 || 0414 || +0007 || @GabrielBarsch
44) || 01943 || 0293 || 01642 || 0008 || 0000 || +0000 || @artificial
45) || 01940 || 0339 || 01521 || 0080 || 0000 || +0000 || @DUDE4U
46) || 01937 || 0487 || 01446 || 0004 || 0000 || +0000 || @thepromaster
47) || 01929 || 0443 || 01441 || 0008 || 0037 || +0000 || @evil-iron
48) || 01912 || 0617 || 00824 || 0373 || 0098 || +0000 || @MegaGold
49) || 01861 || 0135 || 00447 || 1193 || 0086 || +0000 || @fatkidwitajetpak
50) || 01840 || 0583 || 01250 || 0007 || 0000 || +0001 || @jonthomson

51) || 01838 || 0031 || 00147 || 1578 || 0082 || +0000 || @Chronamut
52) || 01832 || 0049 || 00107 || 1668 || 0008 || +0001 || @Buoy
53) || 01829 || 0360 || 01375 || 0031 || 0063 || +0002 || @iscrulz
54) || 01812 || 0599 || 01163 || 0037 || 0013 || +0000 || @Frenzy
55) || 01789 || 0221 || 00728 || 0364 || 0476 || +0000 || @jakbaronking
56) || 01785 || 0300 || 01484 || 0000 || 0001 || +0000 || @Compdude
57) || 01714 || 0251 || 00833 || 0117 || 0513 || +0031 || @Necroionutwiz 1
58) || 01694 || 0404 || 00397 || 0893 || 0000 || +0000 || @Blackplastic -1
59) || 01679 || 0389 || 01290 || 0000 || 0000 || +0000 || @AfroUnderscoreStud
60) || 01674 || 0920 || 00752 || 0002 || 0000 || +0000 || @reddeye5
61) || 01664 || 1016 || 00648 || 0000 || 0000 || +0008 || @Geminate 1
62) || 01662 || 0628 || 00839 || 0005 || 0190 || +0000 || @XPaleRiderx -1
63) || 01645 || 0042 || 00079 || 0102 || 1422 || +0000 || @DaffD1608
64) || 01623 || 0209 || 00703 || 0497 || 0214 || +0001 || @Soapbubble
65) || 01610 || 0299 || 01250 || 0043 || 0018 || +0000 || @IceDragon64
66) || 01602 || 0590 || 00818 || 0186 || 0008 || +0000 || @Zouk
67) || 01583 || 0256 || 01297 || 0030 || 0000 || +0000 || @SeizureDog
68) || 01579 || 0755 || 00757 || 0020 || 0047 || +0004 || @xAyjAy
69) || 01564 || 0409 || 01088 || 0059 || 0008 || +0000 || @Markface
70) || 01559 || 0286 || 01253 || 0010 || 0010 || +0000 || @wizardman
71) || 01555 || 0401 || 01152 || 0002 || 0000 || +0000 || @RemRulzz
72) || 01537 || 0327 || 00740 || 0028 || 0442 || +0014 || @drakke125 1
73) || 01534 || 0070 || 00457 || 0042 || 0965 || +0004 || @Saminat -1
74) || 01509 || 0031 || 00226 || 0054 || 1198 || +0013 || @mait192 +3
75) || 01506 || 0524 || 00982 || 0000 || 0000 || +0000 || @Daedo-The-Mofo -1
76) || 01506 || 0090 || 00536 || 0051 || 0829 || +0001 || @VidGameDude -1
77) || 01500 || 0108 || 00648 || 0684 || 0060 || +0000 || @Seamonky -1
78) || 01497 || 0062 || 00150 || 1114 || 0171 || +0019 || @LucidShadowDreamer +3
79) || 01493 || 0817 || 00277 || 0288 || 0111 || +0000 || @Ray80 -1
80) || 01488 || 0072 || 00192 || 1221 || 0003 || +0002 || @GoreBastard -1
81) || 01480 || 0681 || 00765 || 0032 || 0002 || +0000 || @Aznime -1
82) || 01465 || 0144 || 01257 || 0036 || 0028 || +0000 || @MAYORMCHEESE
83) || 01456 || 0049 || 00187 || 0823 || 0397 || +0000 || @Dchuyv
84) || 01447 || 0156 || 01028 || 0181 || 0082 || +0000 || @emanhattan
85) || 01424 || 0023 || 00115 || 1251 || 0035 || +0000 || @Broken-Needle
86) || 01417 || 0062 || 00439 || 0104 || 0812 || +0001 || @bocodamondo
87) || 01406 || 0004 || 00023 || 1378 || 0001 || +0009 || @F-777 1
88) || 01402 || 0274 || 01127 || 0001 || 0000 || +0000 || @AntiGravity -1
89) || 01397 || 0134 || 01186 || 0065 || 0012 || +0000 || @KyuubiT
90) || 01368 || 0281 || 00854 || 0088 || 0145 || .-0001 || @bloo-apple
91) || 01363 || 0522 || 00239 || 0024 || 0578 || +0000 || @PoisonHeart
92) || 01351 || 0284 || 01067 || 0000 || 0000 || +0000 || @Michelangelo
93) || 01350 || 0276 || 01071 || 0003 || 0000 || +0000 || @S-K
94) || 01338 || 0298 || 01040 || 0000 || 0000 || .-0001 || @DevastatoR-da-X
95) || 01332 || 0637 || 00581 || 0041 || 0073 || +0000 || @TharosTheDragon
96) || 01319 || 0013 || 00022 || 1281 || 0003 || +0000 || @Helth
97) || 01318 || 0374 || 00800 || 0096 || 0048 || +0000 || @sumidiotdude
98) || 01310 || 0543 || 00618 || 0030 || 0119 || +0000 || @FearedSoul
99) || 01303 || 0004 || 00024 || 1226 || 0049 || +0000 || @JackRocker
100) || 1294 || 0128 || 01150 || 0016 || 0000 || +0000 || @Chris-Aldin

At 5/2/18 01:41 PM, Auz wrote: Here's the May 2018 update!

Many thanks to @byteslinger for keeping the Automated User List Tools running despite the recent lay-out changes to NG profiles.

It was challenging - but fun!

Thanks! Although now @Auz may have to go through another list. I feel crappy for bumping people down a notch. Might also want to look at the StaticSkull account that also randomly popped up in the newcomers. @NekoMika may be able to check and see.

I think StaticSkull is a legit one.

I will check that out.

@byteslinger I don't think the issue with ADR3-N/EDM364 has been entirely resolved yet as the Stat Management tool still lists them separately.

Might be another dupe record in the user master - I will also check that out as well.

Also, I've also been having some issues with users not showing up on the reviewers list while they are included in the database according to the User Tools page. Specifically these are mait192 and LucidShadowDreamer.

Yes, actually I found that bug last night AFTER the month processing completed. There are some users that don't have reviews or posts or what not, so those fields aren't found in the HTML. The scanner program that reads in the HTML keeps track of "bad" fields and if more than 10 errors occur, it assumes a bad read. But a missing field is NOT an error. I changed the validation logic so going forward this should be good. I just checked these two accounts, and their current data did load - sorry about that!

I'm unsure what the issue might be and if there's any easy way to fix it. If it's too much trouble I'm fine with adding them manually though.

Nope. Gotta make it right!

At 5/2/18 01:41 PM, Auz wrote: Here's the May 2018 update!

Many thanks to @byteslinger for keeping the Automated User List Tools running despite the recent lay-out changes to NG profiles.

Seconded. @byteslinger is bae.

I think StaticSkull is a legit one.

I'll send you a PM, but suffice to say I don't think we will be seeing any more of him around.

Top Gainers:
+1098 - @XwaynecoltX
+0571 - @Cyberdevil
+0119 - @Ericho
+0077 - @TaintedLogic
+0051 - @ADR3-N

If everyone keeps this up, we'll have to start tabbing repeat appearances.
Also, nuts that I showed up here again. I had no idea.

38) || 02130 || 0202 || 00451 || 1334 || 0143 || +0051 || @ADR3-N 1
39) || 02101 || 0159 || 00712 || 0139 || 1091 || +0009 || @VicariousE -1

@VicariousE, 30 to go, and you'll pass me -- again!

Thanks, @Auz!

At 5/2/18 02:09 PM, ADR3-N wrote:

38) || 02130 || 0202 || 00451 || 1334 || 0143 || +0051 || @ADR3-N 1
39) || 02101 || 0159 || 00712 || 0139 || 1091 || +0009 || @VicariousE -1

@VicariousE, 30 to go, and you'll pass me -- again!

Thanks, @Auz!

Oh you :3 that's very sweet, but I'm sure you'll hold the lead.. even if I do get a little more proactive.

At 5/2/18 02:41 PM, VicariousE wrote: Oh you :3 that's very sweet, but I'm sure you'll hold the lead.. even if I do get a little more proactive.

Hey, don't lose heart. I was gone for like a month with computer issues. There's yet hope!

Also, I really had no idea I'd written so many reviews this month. Time flies I suppose.

At 5/2/18 01:41 PM, Auz wrote: Here's the May 2018 update!

Thanks for the update!

Many thanks to @byteslinger for keeping the Automated User List Tools running despite the recent lay-out changes to NG profiles.

And thank ya @byteslinger for fixing up this thing! :) No rest for the handy...

+1098 - @XwaynecoltX
+0571 - @Cyberdevil

Four digit gains this time huh! XD I just can't match the master, but steady gains, at least!

02) || 22881 || 4507 || 11047 || 2616 || 4711 || +0571 || @Cyberdevil

And closing in on 23K...

At 5/2/18 02:44 PM, ADR3-N wrote: I really had no idea I'd written so many reviews this month. Time flies I suppose.

The other way around isn't it? :P It's like time stands still when you make such progress. Good times!

At 5/2/18 01:41 PM, Auz wrote: Here's the May 2018 update!
Update #228 (2 May 2018)

.#_ || .Total. ||Game||.Movie.||Audio|| .Art. || .Diff. || Name
16) || 03720 || 2065 || 00340 || 0315 || 1000 || +0020 || @DoctorStrongbad

Very happy to have gained 20 reviews this update. I am slowly making progress against all the odds.

@Cyberdevil I think you may take 1-st place next year.

Honored to have made the top gainers list again! Thanks for the update Auz.

At 5/2/18 09:28 PM, Pecheneg wrote: @Cyberdevil I think you may take 1-st place next year.

I would not be surprised by that at all. He makes plenty of reviews, and none are ever deleted. I would be happy to have a few months with his review stat gains. ;)

At 5/2/18 02:58 PM, Cyberdevil wrote:

+1098 - @XwaynecoltX
+0571 - @Cyberdevil

Four digit gains this time huh! XD I just can't match the master, but steady gains, at least!

No master at all but I do enjoy some decent reviewing I really won't be doing this forever but then again you never know I have only been at the top of this list for 15 years so at some point there will be someone new

Congrats to everyone for there's gains and thanks auz for awlays updating this list

~X~

At 5/3/18 06:01 AM, XwaynecoltX wrote: No master at all but I do enjoy some decent reviewing I really won't be doing this forever but then again you never know I have only been at the top of this list for 15 years so at some point there will be someone new

You sure have been saying that a while now. XD Don't know if I can keep this pace another 15 years... not that it'd be any fun it wasn't a bit of a challenge, though!

At 5/2/18 09:28 PM, Pecheneg wrote: @Cyberdevil I think you may take 1-st place next year.

Thanks man. Guess we'll see... might be another decade. ;)

At 5/3/18 06:01 AM, XwaynecoltX wrote:

At 5/2/18 02:58 PM, Cyberdevil wrote:

+1098 - @XwaynecoltX
+0571 - @Cyberdevil

Four digit gains this time huh! XD I just can't match the master, but steady gains, at least!

No master at all but I do enjoy some decent reviewing I really won't be doing this forever but then again you never know I have only been at the top of this list for 15 years so at some point there will be someone new

You might as well become a review mod at this point. Who else would be able to judge a review than the guy who has been number one for 15 years? Seriously, go for it.

At 5/3/18 06:39 PM, DoctorStrongbad wrote: You might as well become a review mod at this point. Who else would be able to judge a review than the guy who has been number one for 15 years? Seriously, go for it.

Asking to become a mod is a quick way not to become one, but I'd toss a recommendation in there. Anyone who manages that many reviews over a 15 year period without mass deletions surely must know the guidelines at least somewhat. Otherwise, that's an insane amount of luck.

At 5/10/18 04:41 PM, ADR3-N wrote:

At 5/3/18 06:39 PM, DoctorStrongbad wrote: You might as well become a review mod at this point. Who else would be able to judge a review than the guy who has been number one for 15 years? Seriously, go for it.

Asking to become a mod is a quick way not to become one, but I'd toss a recommendation in there. Anyone who manages that many reviews over a 15 year period without mass deletions surely must know the guidelines at least somewhat. Otherwise, that's an insane amount of luck.

I agree with you. I was just trying to encourage my friend to take the first step. He would be an awesome review mod.