I say el ditch it. 2 seconds can mean alot on a slow computer.

Nice, more space, shorter loading time. Efficiency has been increased.
Too bad about the stardust thingy, but who really cares about that.

if it's faster.. why not

that is fucking gay why the hell would they do that.that sucks i think sticksuicide is doing it they are just coping real flash animators(NG)

2 seconds faster? Less likely for seizures! Yeah!

skip, skip, skip KEEP IT!

At 8/12/02 05:07 PM, TomFulp wrote: Completely random opinion poll...

If I removed the fun little animated "stardust" NG logo from the BBS (here's a secret - try clicking and dragging your mouse around the logo!), and made the "POST NEW TOPIC" button higher, more horizontal and less vertical... We could gain a good 75 pixels of space before users have to start scrolling down. The page might also load two seconds faster and be less likely to cause seizures. Your thoughts?

Well, I personally like the little bugger, but someone mentioned that two seconds can mean a lot on a slow computer. My computer isn't slow, but I can't think of just myself. How about the hundreds upon hundreds of other NG users?

An seizures? I've never personally had epileptic seizures and besides, there are TONS of other things on NG that could cause that. And have you ever had an angry mother or lawyer come to you saying "poor little Timmy's dumbass had an epileptic seizure while he was licking the stardust logo." I say keep it. Why lose a good thing?

Sorry to change the subject but I just found a cat dynamics ripoff page http://www.angelfire.com/scifi/robocat/

I are not Believing tatht we are robets for you must not remove banner because I are not being optimistaical if remove the banner you are Bishnu the caslte will destroy you yes. You Must remember that auto-cannibalism is not the answer

AUTO-CANNIBALISM IS NOT THE ANSWER!!!!!
IT IS NOT I TELL YOU!!!

At 8/12/02 05:07 PM, TomFulp wrote: Completely random opinion poll...

If I removed the fun little animated "stardust" NG logo from the BBS ,...etc

leave it there. Who cares about a few pixels if you can have a fun little log in exchange? :)

At 8/13/02 04:50 PM, beefcake wrote:

At 8/12/02 05:07 PM, TomFulp wrote: Completely random opinion poll...

If I removed the fun little animated "stardust" NG logo from the BBS ,...etc

leave it there. Who cares about a few pixels if you can have a fun little log in exchange? :)

d'I mean logo

Personally, I think you should revamp the BBS, and Make it longer to load. Besides, all those new flash movies and games coming out require a comp wit a decent processor to be able to run them efficiently. Besides, if you ,make it take longer, that will force little Timmy to beg his mom to buy him a faster comp and dsl connection so his undressing games load faster. In turn, that will boost the economy and lower taxes. Good huh? SO you see Tom, one simple change in the BBS will ultimately create a cataclismic fluctuation in our economy. Now imagine if you completely revamped the PORTAL page. Now that would create a huge catalyst which would hark in a major change in the way our whole society thinks and behaves. So you see Tom, you and Newgrounds have to power to change the entire world for the betterment of all mankind.

At 8/13/02 04:30 PM, Gamma_Goblin wrote: I are not Believing tatht we are robets for you must not remove banner because I are not being optimistaical if remove the banner you are Bishnu the caslte will destroy you yes. You Must remember that auto-cannibalism is not the answer

AUTO-CANNIBALISM IS NOT THE ANSWER!!!!!
IT IS NOT I TELL YOU!!!

What in hell that mean?

Here's an opinion. Tom Fulp is Gay. You too Wade.

Bin the little logo, it's not needed. 75px is a lot.

One thing......on the portal movie that you have just clicked, couldnt you show...say....the last 5 reviews rather then seeing the one. One man's trash is another man's treasure.

At 8/12/02 05:07 PM, TomFulp wrote: Completely random opinion poll...

If I removed the fun little animated "stardust" NG logo from the BBS (here's a secret - try clicking and dragging your mouse around the logo!), and made the "POST NEW TOPIC" button higher, more horizontal and less vertical... We could gain a good 75 pixels of space before users have to start scrolling down. The page might also load two seconds faster and be less likely to cause seizures. Your thoughts?

I played the pico game where the gothic kids take over the school, I got to as far as fighting the telepathic guy...I CANT BEAT HIM....I gotten pretty close, but the kid he throws to the right of you, gets me everytime. Any suggestions/Pointers? Thanks Lace :)

ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmm, like, yeah!!!!!! of course!!!!!! (lol)

At 8/12/02 05:07 PM, TomFulp wrote: Completely random opinion poll...

If I removed the fun little animated "stardust" NG logo from the BBS (here's a secret - try clicking and dragging your mouse around the logo!), and made the "POST NEW TOPIC" button higher, more horizontal and less vertical... We could gain a good 75 pixels of space before users have to start scrolling down. The page might also load two seconds faster and be less likely to cause seizures. Your thoughts?

At 8/12/02 05:07 PM, TomFulp wrote: Completely random opinion poll...

If I removed the fun little animated "stardust" NG logo from the BBS (here's a secret - try clicking and dragging your mouse around the logo!), and made the "POST NEW TOPIC" button higher, more horizontal and less vertical... We could gain a good 75 pixels of space before users have to start scrolling down. The page might also load two seconds faster and be less likely to cause seizures. Your thoughts?

I'm fine with that.

At 8/12/02 05:07 PM, TomFulp wrote: Completely random opinion poll...

If I removed the fun little animated "stardust" NG logo from the BBS (here's a secret - try clicking and dragging your mouse around the logo!), and made the "POST NEW TOPIC" button higher, more horizontal and less vertical... We could gain a good 75 pixels of space before users have to start scrolling down. The page might also load two seconds faster and be less likely to cause seizures. Your thoughts?

At 8/13/02 07:26 PM, krazylacy wrote: I played the pico game where the gothic kids take over the school, I got to as far as fighting the telepathic guy...I CANT BEAT HIM....I gotten pretty close, but the kid he throws to the right of you, gets me everytime. Any suggestions/Pointers? Thanks Lace :)

Dude, if you can't beat that guy then i hate to say, but youre one sorry ass dude. Just shoot what he throws at you. Soon hell get exhausted, and when he does just shoot at him repeatedly until he starts throwing shit at you again. Rinse and repeat.

two seconds faster
yes yes yes!

yes, Tom, Please!

Loading faster is a very good idea! cutting down on the size of some of those new ads would aslo help, Geez they're tossing in some HUGE ads at the TOP of the pages.,...

At 8/13/02 01:22 AM, fospher wrote: then you might want to make that your new poll --- you havent changed the old one since about three months ago...

and this isnt really a discussion tom - you never answer any of the suggestions with a reply, unlike wade - and i dont like it

For that I am sorry.

-Tom

Just leave it, it fine.

"Which would be scarier, going through life believing in God, dying, and finding out there isnt one, Or going through life not believing in God, dying, and finding out there is?

At 8/13/02 03:09 PM, s1nt3ch wrote: Sorry to change the subject but I just found a cat dynamics ripoff page http://www.angelfire.com/scifi/robocat/

Well hot damn... I especially like the VERY SMALL disclaimer at the bottom:

"Site idea borrowed from the "Cat Dynamics" section of Newgrounds.com. Roboticat is not in any way affiliated with Cat Dynamics or Newgrounds.com"

Heh...

-Tom

At 8/12/02 05:07 PM, TomFulp wrote: Completely random opinion poll...

do it, as long as takes less than 6 hours to do

ANYTHING that improves site access and performance is welcome ... the sluggish response time of NG is the only bad thing about the site (but it's a REALLY bad thing!).

REmove it and get rid of a little chunk of ng history, or, leave it and sacrifice 2 seconds of load time and efficency. I say keep it and shift it elsewhere, hence load time seems faster, top loading pages that is, and well you can give yourself a seizure if you don't want to work anymore. Hey best of both worlds. Keep it, just shift it.