At 2/17/18 10:16 AM, Hacklyn wrote:
At 2/17/18 08:12 AM, MrPercie wrote:
you know what, it doesn't Have TO, its why we have things called social services, therapy, psychiatry, psychotherapy , specialists who are trained in this fucking shit who know what they're doing and can actually help people
Because to be blunt if you were cracking and wanted a gun you're not about to make it difficult for yourself are you?
And this the angle people really don't get when they push the "mental health" issue.
WHAT THAT MEANS is a system of government funded surveillance and forced treatment for people who are innocent of any crime.
In order for that to happen, the healthcare system would basically be absorbing the police, and the right to "innocent until proven guilty" becomes a mere formality.
It is very, very rare (It NEVER HAPPENS, but I don't like to talk in absolutes) for a person to say to themselves "Gosh, I am a threat to others. I better have myself locked up, because even though I'm a threat to others, I'm totally a good guy who doesn't want to hurt anyone"
/\ do you see the factual conflict in that statement? Nobody. Ever. Does. ANYTHING. They. Don't. Think. Is. Right. At. The. Time. If you're thinking you might hurt someone, it's because you think they deserve to get hurt.
So then who are the people you're planning to hunt down (because they're not going to turn themselves in), round up (Because you can't "treat" them if you can't get them in a doctor's office), and ultimately, force to conform to the medical establishments idea of "mental health" (for which there is no actual definition)?
Religious people think atheists are dangerously mentally ill. After all, they're going to hell, and they might convince others to go, too. Best to lock them up. In 1930's Germany, the first arm of Holocaust was the rounding up of all "mental defectives." Later, "Mental defective" was expanded to include homosexuals, communists, and cultural outsiders such as jews and gypsies. In Russia, the mental health system was used in the same way.
With the current model of trauma informed care, what this amounts to is compounded victimization. A girl could be raped at 16. Her parents, trying to do the right thing, take her to a doctor. The doctor says "Everyone who gets raped has PTSD. Even though she's done nothing wrong, she has to be medicated to control her anger. She's justified in having extreme violent rage against the world, and she needs to be prevented from ever having her revenge"
If you don't know anything about how the mental health system works, you can't wait to crow in "MENTAL HEALTH! MENTAL HEALTH! SCIENCE IS THE ANSWER" and the reason you do that is that you have NO FUCKING CLUE HOW THE MENTAL HEALTH SYSTEM WORKS.
200 years ago, science believed in witchcraft, and their idea of "mental health" was forcing confessions out of crazy people and setting them on fire so they would go to heaven.
Currently, the mental health system is mainly the pathway by which the elderly are forced against their wills into nursing homes.
That's what "treatment" really means. Institutionalization.
Treatment is jail. But not just any jail, crazy jail, where everyone else is the worst possible kind of insanely violent.
You need to look up the statistics of how many people (men too) who get raped or assaulted in a mental ward.
HINT: It's higher than the rate for convicts in prison
This is what you want? To lock people who have committed no crime away? In a place that is basically hell on earth?
I mean, I like guns and all, but goddamn, banning 30 round clips seems like a lot less of an injustice than throwing rape victims in prison.