The sequel to the classic game Coma is finally here!4.32 / 5.00 19,169 Views
SiNKR is a minimalist puzzle game4.01 / 5.00 6,039 Views
Game about an angry biker looking for revenge3.73 / 5.00 6,779 Views
At 3 minutes ago, FairSquare wrote: No, you wouldn't attack, you would defend. Right?
Oh gee, Sherlock, thanks for noticing that.
At 3 minutes ago, Supersteph54 wrote:At 3 minutes ago, FairSquare wrote: No, you wouldn't attack, you would defend. Right?Oh gee, Sherlock, thanks for noticing that.
No problem, Moriarty.
At 32 minutes ago, kazumazkan wrote: holder her back instead of punching her
No. That's just dumb. Women still kick and scratch and get even more pissed when grabbed.
I do not really understand because women are the same blood as we men and they have the same rights and everything and they say that they want to be treated equally. Why the hell can't we hit them if they hit us?
XBL: Taillesspack819 Send a Friend Request if u want :D
I would avoid any situation that would require such actions.
If the situation was right, yeah I would strike a woman, really depends on the circumstance.
I don't think I could ever say "never hit a girl". Then again I'm not saying I would enjoy it if I had to, either. Sometimes though, you just have to.
Who's your warden, baby?
At 14 hours ago, Blazejsg wrote: If she does shes just asking for it although u can just restrain her.
So? Who gives a fuck what you could do? They could have not hit you. They go to striking I also go to striking. I don't care one bit if it'd be a girl, you come at me hitting, I'll treat you just like I would a male. If people want equality, they better expect an equal reaction.
All the cool kids have signature text
I would hit anyone that is a physical threat to my safety or the safety of others. Just because she has boobs and a vagina does not mean she's immune from people using self defense.
UNDER ThE SEAAAA
darling its better down where its wetter UNDER THE SEA, u[ on the shore they work all day, up in the sun they slave all day, while we devote all day to floatiing away!!!!
UNDER THE SEA!!
call me toxie 0.~
It's wrong to hit anyone unprovoked, male or female, I don't discriminate in terms of retaliation.
Unless of course the other person is not on equal ground with me, such as already incapacitated in any way, but then they're already probably easy to subdue non-violently or even just ignore.
Hitting girls isn't bad, hitting people in general is bad.
I think people who say "guys who hits girls are pussies" are idiots. If someone threatens me (or does anything related to that) and it makes me feel like the only option I have left is to punch them in the face, I won't care if that person is a girl or a guy.
I prefer not to hit anyone unless it's absolutely necessary, gender isn't a factor and it shouldn't be.
I Maybe A Sick Fuck On The Inside, But Honey I'm Still the same Fucking Antisocial Asshole On The Outside. SO GET USE TO IT!!!!
At 19 hours ago, Blazejsg wrote: 1.It leads you to a bad reputation.
2.Girls will be afraid you, due to the gossip going on.
3.You may be sentenced to jail.
Not likely, if it wasn't me who started it. It's the instigator's own fault if they lose a fight they picked.
Honestly I would be scared If I got hit back harder.
Then here's a clue: Don't get physically violent with someone considerably stronger than you in the first place.
I mean what happened to the days when it all men't "If you hit a girl you aren't a man anymore."
Societal progress happened, that's what.
Seriously, this whole "Don't hit girls" thing was just another way for men to patronise women and brand them as inherently weaker than men. The equality that allows you to earn the same wage as men, vote, and many other freedoms works both ways here. No matter how many labels you give yourself ("Woman / man"; "Black / white"; "Young / old", etc.), you are still no more, or less, of a person than anyone else. As such, you are just as much bound by equal rights as you are entitled to them.
Honestly It's ok if it deals with a girl threatening you, or something to due with the loss of your life or items.
I'm struggling to think of any situation that involves being physically struck, but not "threatened". Hitting someone is a pretty obvious display of threatening intentions, after all. As has been said loads of times already in this thread, gender is of no importance when it comes to stopping someone attempting to injure you, as far as the laws of self-defence are concerned, and rightly so too.
If I was hit once, I might or might not retaliate, depending on the situation. If she had been verbally abusing me, making rash accusations, etc. I would probably hit her once to get her attention and tell her to back off. Otherwise I would let it go.
But if a girl really wanted to bring serious harm to me and wouldn't stop until I stopped her myself, I would firstly try to defend myself and secondly try to incapacitate her without injuring her.