Be a Supporter!
  • Member since: Mar. 17, 2008
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Level 11
Response to Iowa Caucuses 2012-01-06 22:13:00 Reply

At 1/6/12 08:28 PM, aviewaskewed wrote: ...what if Newt isn't even after the White House here really?

I'm not sure what Newt is thinking. Mr. $300,000-in-ethics-sanctions-resigned-fr om-the-House-in-disgrace has some seriously scary skeletons in his closet. How fucked up do you have to be to think you can win with his history? I want some of what he's smoking!

Maybe Mr. $300,000-in-ethics-sanctions-resigned-fr om-the-House-in-disgrace thought the MSM would be nicer to him than it has been to Ron Paul, and not dredge up any old dirt and repeat it over and over and over... in this case, things that NEWT REALLY DID, not older things that RON PAUL DIDN'T DO!

I repeat, pass that joint over here, Newt.

What I really suspect is that Obama has proven himself to be a good little sold-out whore for his global corporate masters, and the Republicans are simply being set up for another fall. There's little doubt in my mind that John McCain was. I mean, Sarah Palin? Really? First, Republicans don't like women. One only has to count the number of female Republicans vs. the number of female Democrats in Congress to know that score. Second... SARAH PALIN? Puh-leeze! Even if the Republican Party wasn't the Party of Sexism (which it unfortunately is), intellectually speaking, she couldn't talk her way out of a paper bag.

I think they're being set up. Some of the players (Mitt and Newt most notably) might even suspect it, but know they'll be lavishly rewarded for playing it straight and taking the fall. The others probably don't have a clue.

I just think it's hilarious that the MSM (singular but plural in construction) is treating the Republican Primaries as if it were an exciting race. I'm like, so what? Whoop-de-do! Who's gonna be the Designated Loser? My money, of course, is on Mitt.

Dur-de-dur, durp-de-durp-durp.

BBS Signature