igirlgames

[Gimmick]

Who here hates it and thinks should get this off the site say "Aye"

Aye

I sent a PM through my alt account, and that's the test to see if it's actually a bot that's submitting it or real humans; either way it's my alt so I won't be grilled a lot incase they do reply.

But if they don't, then Wade, you have an excuse.
Maybe the whole of NG will benefit if the account does get deleted.

correction, NG will benefit

[Gerbil]

i dont know what youre talking about mang

[Squidbit]

I never heard of them until now so yeah I don't care at all. Not even a little bit.

[Gimmick]

At 7/22/11 12:55 PM, Gerbil wrote: i dont know what youre talking about mang

The flash portal, the cookie cutter dressup games mang!

[Asandir]

Well, the dress up games are getting really annoying lately, and it seems like there are more of those flashes than ever before.

[BritishGamer]

At 7/22/11 12:57 PM, Asandir wrote: Well, the dress up games are getting really annoying lately, and it seems like there are more of those flashes than ever before.

Even worse - unlike the old classic dress up games, the "dolls" aren't nude D:

it's the end of the fucking world, man, the fucking end

[Kanon]

I know of them, I think it's safe to say that it's probably a bot, but i'm not entirely sure. I've blammed my fair amount of these "games" if you can call them that, but I think they need to be gone as they're only spam now.

Aye.

[Chdonga]

At 7/22/11 01:01 PM, BritishGamer wrote: Even worse - unlike the old classic dress up games, the "dolls" aren't nude D:

But the igirlgames' dress up dolls are just as bland looking and under-detailed as the ones from the old classic ones.

I'm all for the destruction of igirlgames. Aye.

[Jackho]

I hate them/it so damn much. There is a new shitty almost every single day and despite my furious blamming they pass judgement most of the time.

I see they have just submitted another flash (''Lovely girl bedroom'', it's at the top of the portal). If y'all have any sense it wont be there much longer.

Also, notice how the profile says they're male. That's a little creepy.

[sweet21]

Tom had a personal debate about this with himself in a news post. He was wondering if he should just ban users like "igirlgames," and "games2dress," but then wondered if it would defeat the purpose of this site: everything by everyone. It was alot of back-and-forthing but the options were: "perma-ban these users and destroy their annoyance forever" or "Let the users vote 0 and at least give a fair chance, and if not, more blam/protection points to em."
Tom obviously chose the second option, thereby igirlgames is alive and still on the site, though, I doubt thriving.

[Kanon]

At 7/22/11 01:15 PM, sweet21 wrote: Tom had a personal debate about this with himself in a news post. He was wondering if he should just ban users like "igirlgames," and "games2dress," but then wondered if it would defeat the purpose of this site: everything by everyone. It was alot of back-and-forthing but the options were: "perma-ban these users and destroy their annoyance forever" or "Let the users vote 0 and at least give a fair chance, and if not, more blam/protection points to em."
Tom obviously chose the second option, thereby igirlgames is alive and still on the site, though, I doubt thriving.

I think they should be at least checked to see if their bots or what not because i'm certain everyone is getting a bit tired of blamming the same submission daily, only for it to pass another day, it's happened once or twice before with both "igirlgames" and "games2dress" as they resubmitted blammed flash with different titles. If there are any now, play them and watch them and blame them if you believe it deserves it then watch, a few days later the same game but a new title header will be released.

[Jolly]

At 7/22/11 12:54 PM, Gimmick wrote: Who here hates it and thinks should get this off the site say "Aye"

Aye

I sent a PM through my alt account, and that's the test to see if it's actually a bot that's submitting it or real humans; either way it's my alt so I won't be grilled a lot incase they do reply.

But if they don't, then Wade, you have an excuse.
Maybe the whole of NG will benefit if the account does get deleted.

correction, NG will benefit

Even if it isn't a bot, it's not likely they're going to take the time to respond to your PM. If you PM any of the large websites like fogNG, AddictingGames, etc they most likely aren't going to respond. That doesn't mean they're a bot.

[Magical-Zorse]

I think I heard tom talking about how he's going to get rid of cookie cutter games with the redesign.

[RyanBustersword123]

At 7/22/11 01:14 PM, Jackho wrote: I hate them/it so damn much. There is a new shitty almost every single day and despite my furious blamming they pass judgement most of the time.

I see they have just submitted another flash (''Lovely girl bedroom'', it's at the top of the portal). If y'all have any sense it wont be there much longer.

i think that game will make it like the rest but i hope it doesn't so i voted 0, if they are posting flash games for 10 year old girls on a newgrounds which is made for 13 and up to 30 years old people that means they're REALLY desperate for attention A LOT more desperate than the attention whores in the bbs

[Garage]

Would someone who understands this thread please explain to me what is going on?

[Suprememessage]

At 7/22/11 02:06 PM, RyanBustersword123 wrote:

At 7/22/11 01:14 PM, Jackho wrote: I hate them/it so damn much. There is a new shitty almost every single day and despite my furious blamming they pass judgement most of the time.

I see they have just submitted another flash (''Lovely girl bedroom'', it's at the top of the portal). If y'all have any sense it wont be there much longer.

i think that game will make it like the rest but i hope it doesn't so i voted 0, if they are posting flash games for 10 year old girls on a newgrounds which is made for 13 and up to 30 years old people that means they're REALLY desperate for attention A LOT more desperate than the attention whores in the bbs

There is no max age for this site, but dude, watch your ass, Poozy is older than 30. Seriously......

watch it. BEFORE IT IS TOO LATE TO SAVE YOURSELF.

[PsychoZoid]

At 7/22/11 02:08 PM, Garage wrote: Would someone who understands this thread please explain to me what is going on?

They're talking about this account called "igirlgames" that keep submitting many dress-up games and shit into the portal. I seen them myself actually. Even though I am aware the dress up games were spam coming from a bot account, I still vote them to pass judgement, anyway for some reason.

[dx5231]

Yeah, like, there are almost no chicks on newgrounds, and there is no nudity on the games, so why are they even bothering. Newgrounders are never going to like these games. So, just vote 0 on them so they don't pass. All they submit are dressup games, which is really unoriginal. Why do shit like this even pass?

[RyanBustersword123]

At 7/22/11 02:08 PM, Garage wrote: Would someone who understands this thread please explain to me what is going on?

there is a newgrounds user called "igirlgames"who posts A LOT of dress up games daily on the flash portal like "Lovely Girl Bedroom" (which can be seen now in the recent submissions) just to get attention to their site, and people are now not bamming the games to get some extra save points daily

[MisogynisticDonut]

Now I want to look at porn.

[RyanBustersword123]

watch it. BEFORE IT IS TOO LATE TO SAVE YOURSELF.

OK i'm watching it 24/7, poozy ain't gonna get near it anytime

[TheCupcakeArmy]

I play them every day.

[TheBlueRaven]

omg I love this games sooo much

I can dress them up like my waifu <3 <3

[Asandir]

At 7/22/11 02:53 PM, TheCupcakeArmy wrote: I play them every day.

That is completely okay, if you like them. It just seems so, like more and more of them get uploaded every day.

At 7/22/11 01:54 PM, Magical-Zorse wrote: I think I heard tom talking about how he's going to get rid of cookie cutter games with the redesign.

That would be nice. Or atleast cut it down to an acceptable ammount, and not so many per day.