At 2/5/10 12:56 AM, Nateofwar wrote:At 2/4/10 11:41 PM, Version2 wrote: I've been thinking about this a little today. Even after the lit portal goes up, I'm sure that most people will want an editor, or at the very least an extra set of eyes, to look over their piece before they post it. Maybe it would be beneficial to have volunteer editors?It's a good premise but if somone made a certain mistake in there work then there probably going to be more likely to not catch that mistake in your paper. It also brings up the question: If your good enough to proofread somone elses paper why not just do your owm?
I'm about something were 2 people will get together, exchange their stories/poems/whatever, and each person can look over the other guys work, giving him notes, pointing out grammar errors and typos to be fixed. Pretty much a "you do mine, I'll do yours" type deal.
I'm up for it if anyone else is. If enough people are interested, I could start a thread.
I think being unable to proof read your own work comes from the fact that you have (hopefully) read it so many times that you know what you mean to say, regardless of what is actually there. The mind is an amazing thing! -- auto-correct.
Then again, if you really are going to be anal about perfection then hold onto it for a few weeks. Look at it every few days and each time a new perspective will be had. There comes a point in time where you are going to look at your work ojectively regardless of how attached to the words you have become.
Failure should push you until success can pull you.