That's incredible. I wonder if they'll grow up and argue about who was born in the superior decade.
Formerly PuddinN64 - BBS, Icon, and Portal Mod
"Your friends love you anyway" - Check out Guinea Something Good!
Twins Born In 2 Seperate Decades?!?
2,499 Views | 34 Replies
It's not a new decade until 2011.
Lies make baby Jesus cry, bitch.
At 1/2/10 02:51 PM, DeadPelican wrote:At 1/2/10 02:50 PM, Sidorio wrote: It's not a new decade until 2011.Um, yes it is. The 80s didn't start in 1981.
Yeah, the other way is not really regarded as correct anymore.
Formerly PuddinN64 - BBS, Icon, and Portal Mod
"Your friends love you anyway" - Check out Guinea Something Good!
I was the only one in class that knew this when our teacher asked us "how can twins be borned in two seperate decades".
The twins are in intensive care because they were born about 10 weeks early. Doctors say they'll get to go home in about eight weeks.
I'm wondering if they'll even survive.
That's awesome if you think about it.
I laugh at your sigs!
At 1/2/10 03:05 PM, Lol-Icon wrote: I was the only one in class that knew this when our teacher asked us "how can twins be borned in two seperate decades".
The rest of your class is a little slow, huh?
I have to wonder if there were any twins born between December 31, 1999 and January 1, 2000 though.
At 1/2/10 04:57 PM, js45 wrote:At 1/2/10 03:05 PM, Lol-Icon wrote: I was the only one in class that knew this when our teacher asked us "how can twins be borned in two seperate decades".The rest of your class is a little slow, huh?
I have to wonder if there were any twins born between December 31, 1999 and January 1, 2000 though.
"Identical twins born in separate Millenia" has more of a ring to it, no?
At 1/2/10 03:04 PM, puddinN64 wrote:At 1/2/10 02:51 PM, DeadPelican wrote:Yeah, the other way is not really regarded as correct anymore.At 1/2/10 02:50 PM, Sidorio wrote: It's not a new decade until 2011.Um, yes it is. The 80s didn't start in 1981.
Yes it is, 2001 was not the new millennium, 2000 was. Same with 2010 being the start of a new decade.
Don't be STOOPID!
Loooooooooooooooooong time in labor.
The statement below this is false.
The statement above this is true.
Strawberry clock does not approve of years or decades
I'll Eat Your Face
How are they identical twins when they, clearly, look nothing like one another?
We won't really know which decade was superior until this coming decade is over. No use worrying about it now. Doubtless these twins will have plenty problems of their own to deal with from the hangovers of this last decade that it'll be plenty hard to sort out good and bad in each respective decade.
"Sit down and shut up and do as I say" -- Zeus
At 1/2/10 05:50 PM, Tribalfusion-X wrote: How are they identical twins when they, clearly, look nothing like one another?
You just gotta wipe all the placenta and blood off.
Thats awesome. At least they get separate birthdays. :D
instagram.com/five_mile_smile
At 1/2/10 05:11 PM, Prinzy2 wrote:
Yes it is, 2001 was not the new millennium, 2000 was. Same with 2010 being the start of a new decade.
In fact, 2001 WAS the new millennium and 2011 is the beginning of the new decade.
2010 is the final year of the decade.
At 1/2/10 02:50 PM, Sidorio wrote: It's not a new decade until 2011.
technically you're wrong... it goes from 00-09, 10-19, and so on
DevourerJay~Of all the things I've lost, I miss my mind the most.
At 1/2/10 02:51 PM, DeadPelican wrote:At 1/2/10 02:50 PM, Sidorio wrote: It's not a new decade until 2011.Um, yes it is. The 80s didn't start in 1981.
Well either way they still were born in different years
I'm that guy everyone's mom wants their daughter to date. So as you can imagine.....I'm a very lonely person :)
At 1/2/10 04:02 PM, DM692 wrote: The twins are in intensive care because they were born about 10 weeks early. Doctors say they'll get to go home in about eight weeks.
I'm wondering if they'll even survive.
If they didn't survive that would render this topic useless, wouldn't it?
I guess it doesn't matter but I say that 2010 will probably be more superior because a lot of shit happened last year
At 1/2/10 07:21 PM, MissingNYC wrote:At 1/2/10 02:50 PM, Sidorio wrote: It's not a new decade until 2011.technically you're wrong... it goes from 00-09, 10-19, and so on
Amazing, so pompous and yet so wrong.
http://aroundcny.com/technofile/texts/de cademath.htm
There was no year zero!!
It went, 3 BC ,2 BC , 1 BC , 1 AD.
http://wiki.answers.com/Q/When_does_the_
new_decade_start
This is not difficult.
Meh. I thought you meant that one was born 10 years later. Not some technical shit.
At 1/2/10 02:50 PM, Sidorio wrote: It's not a new decade until 2011.
lol wut.
Does anybody even read these?
It's not that exciting. It's just the number of times a rock has revolved around the sun, based on basically jackshit. When's a year end and begin? When we say it does. When's a decade end and begin? When we say it does. It's all meaningless...
At 1/2/10 07:59 PM, scetch00 wrote: Meh. I thought you meant that one was born 10 years later. Not some technical shit.
Somehow I thought the same.
To all you guys who say this is the new decade, that's wrong.
Think. First year of the C.E. Calender was 1.
Ther was no year 0.
First decade was 01-10.
Next was 11-20.
Next was 21-30.
So on and so forth.
This looks froody.
