At 1/24/09 03:34 PM, AlmightyHans wrote: i agree, he doesn't. as much as i like the guy, giving an award is an illusion of being noble. if anything he'd probably roll in his grave if he wins that award.
Actors have died before. Loads of them have died. If every major actior that died were given an Oscar for the "illusion of being noble", there probably wouldn't be room for live actors in the contest (and possibly suicide rates with movie starts would go up).
I mean,t he oscars haven't even been awarded yet, why are you all acting as it is already a fact and automatic? If he gets it, it'll be the same reason he was nominated, the Oscar committe thought his perfomance was worth it.
At 1/24/09 03:34 PM, JohnnyWang wrote:At 1/24/09 03:29 PM, MilestoneRazor wrote: He did an average performance,Opinion.
True.
if he didn't die it wouldn't have mattered.Opinion.
True.
it's not.Opinion.
Fuck you
godfatherOverrated (opinion)
GTFO MY INTERWEBS
At 1/24/09 03:40 PM, MilestoneRazor wrote:At 1/24/09 03:34 PM, JohnnyWang wrote: Opinion.Fuck you
So, it's in no way possible, that The Dark Knight is the best movie someone has ever seen? Even if the only other movies the person has seen were Kangaroo Jack and Gay Ni**ers From Outer Space?
Overrated (opinion)GTFO MY INTERWEBS
Gee, I like movies that don't take ages to get to the point. Cinematography as an artform moves on, accept it. I mean, stuff like A Fistfull of Dollars or M are pretty neat, but they wouldn't just make the cut today.
At 1/24/09 01:14 PM, TheSouthernTower wrote: I stand by this. He played the joker for Christ's sake. He wasn't that good, and the only reason he's getting nominated is because hes dead. If he wins, i am never watching the oscars again.
sounds like you have the sahara in you're gaping vagina
We should nominate someone like Dane Cook instead. His performance and acting style is much more incredible and believable.
Such a funneh guy!
At 1/24/09 03:49 PM, AppleCanuk wrote: We should nominate someone like Dane Cook instead. His performance and acting style is much more incredible and believable.
Such a funneh guy!
LAUGH AT ME I AM ON A CHAIR LAUGH LAUGH AHAHA I MADE A FUNNY AND NOW I AM ACTING LIKE A BIRD LAUGH WITH ME NOW
At 1/24/09 03:49 PM, AppleCanuk wrote: We should nominate someone like Dane Cook instead. His performance and acting style is much more incredible and believable.
Has he even been in movies? Because, you know, they're movie awards...
And no, he's a pillock.
Better acting than batman, you gotta admit.
I agree, Robert Downey Jr. should win.
eh.
I agree with the OP
Although I don't watch the oscars.
Heath Ledger did a good job, but it WASNT THAT FUCKING GREAT. Or possibly I'm in an alternate universe where every praises Ledger. Ah well, I have to finish hiding the weed...
i dont give a fuck a million dollars im a samurai
I didnt even know you rednecks could afford tv's.
I really like 10 reasons why I love you.
Still can't believe such a badass is dead. :(
I really like 10 reasons why I love you.
Still can't believe such a badass is dead. :(
At 1/24/09 01:14 PM, TheSouthernTower wrote: I stand by this. He played the joker for Christ's sake. He wasn't that good, and the only reason he's getting nominated is because hes dead. If he wins, i am never watching the oscars again.
Successful troll is Successful.
God, so sick of this shit.
Ledger was a critical darling long before his death, there's a great chance he'd have been nominated anyway.
At 1/24/09 01:17 PM, Mark618 wrote: who the fuck watches those things anyway. go fucking cry about people who dont know you or give a shit about you, but u care so much about them? fuck that get a life
You're the coolest person in the world.
Schmuck.
Who cares. Your not getting an Oscar are you.
At 1/24/09 01:23 PM, mranarchy wrote: Superior.
i disagree.
:oh he is such a PIMP.
PRICES SO LOW, WE'RE THROWING THEM OUT THE WINDOW!
I actually thought he was great in Dark Knight, your opinion doesnt apply to everyone
His acting was amazing. In fact, everyone in the movie did an amazing job.
To respond to the idiots while i have been away, yes i am VERY down with Hollywood, i hate Dane Cook, and yes i can afford a tv. a very nice one at that. thank you, and fuck all of you.
At 1/24/09 08:43 PM, greensucksbluerules wrote: Heath Ledger is overrated.
thread
Thank you.
You aren't down with logic though if you think his performance wasn't awesome.
At 1/24/09 01:16 PM, Vincoid wrote: Who watches the Oscars anyway?
/thread
I don't know why I'm still here
Because he was the perfect loony.
Heath Ledger was amazing in that movie. That was what got him the nomination. Not the fact that he died right after filming. He did everything great, from the "Why so serious?" part, which now has its own little meme, to the evil laugh. He totally deserves to win.
At 1/24/09 01:14 PM, TheSouthernTower wrote: I stand by this. He played the joker for Christ's sake. He wasn't that good, and the only reason he's getting nominated is because hes dead. If he wins, i am never watching the oscars again.
He deserves the Oscar, he played the part, and he played it well.
You're just an asshole, eat a dick.
At 1/24/09 01:16 PM, Vincoid wrote: Who watches the Oscars anyway?
It isn't a question of who watches them, but who the hell cares who doesn't or does win a shiny naked gold man?
Anywho, Heath Ledger acted well and created a great version of the character but Michael Caine was still the best actor in that film.
C'mon Bale, stop doing the shitty Batman voice.
qwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnm
Cain sucked. THe other alfred is a million times better.
He wasn't acting. He was just being Michael Cain.
Boo.