At 6/14/11 10:40 PM, jarrydn wrote:
At 6/14/11 09:28 PM, Rahmemhotep wrote:
At 6/14/11 07:56 PM, jarrydn wrote:
At 6/14/11 07:47 PM, Rahmemhotep wrote:
At 6/14/11 01:26 PM, SBB wrote:
At 6/14/11 01:07 PM, FatKidWitAJetPak wrote:
And I always make my music at night because the world is a lot more abstract.
It isn't though
Agreed, this sentence doesn't make grammatical or theoretical sense.
Actually, that sentence makes perfect grammatical sense. As for theoretical sense, I'm not quite sure what that means, could you please clarify for my stupid brain?
You can't start a sentence with "and" when writing, so no, it doesn't make grammatical sense.
There's nothing wrong with starting a sentence with a conjunction. If the sentence didn't make grammatical sense to you (to the point of obscured semantics) because he started with a conjunction, then you might need to see a speech therapist. If it did actually make grammatical sense to you, despite the inclusion of "and" at the beginning, then you are simply being irreverent, which is most unbecoming of you.
I think you're misunderstanding grammar and mushing it together with spoken language. Throughout the entirety of my school years, in English writing classes, we were always taught to never start a sentence with, "and." The reason for this is because sentences are supposed to be able to stand on their own and therefore, "And big, bad robots destroyed the city," is not grammatically correct, whether or not it makes sense because of supposed, previous context/content.
"I was alone and big, bad robots destroyed the city," makes sense because the sentence can stand on its own. If I wanted the two ideas within the sentence to stand alone they would be, "I was alone," and, "Big, bad robots destroyed the city."
(I was alone. Big, bad robots destroyed the city.)
The previous example sounds sloppy, though and this is why we have "and", commas, elipses and other such things.
(I was alone... Big, bad robots destroyed the city.) or (I was alone, big, bad robots destroyed the city)
I can't remember all the actual, specific terms and such, but I think you get the idea.
(it's akin to how we are supposed to put those 'tab' things in front of the beginning of paragraphs and all that wacky stuff that even I don't follow on the internet for ease of writing and organization)
For the other thing, I'm saying that I can't see how you could possibly come to that conclusion when all night is, is dark.
If the only difference between night and day for you is darkness/lack of darkness, then you sir have no understanding of the world around you, and a fairly dull imagination.
I still fail to see where theory comes in to it, but I suppose that this does explain your irreverency.
How can you fail to see theory in it when you just made mention to imagination or the lack there-of? I'm not quite sure you're understanding that I can present a one sided view that could be excluding some amount of opinion and ideas. In other words, I like to represent particular ideas at certain times in order to get people to think. I, also, believe I've succeeded this time.