Play Hentai Heroes!

A day with Kirle and Kirla

View Full Size

Click on an icon to vote on this!

Credits & Info

2.24 / 5.00

Jul 8, 2017 | 11:43 AM EDT
File Info
800 x 900 px
597.3 kb

Share this submission?

Related Stuff

Licensing Terms

You are free to copy, distribute and transmit this work under the following conditions:

You must give credit to the artist.
You may not use this work for commercial purposes.
No Derivative Works:
You may not alter, transform, or build upon this work.

Author Comments

Sometimes you should take some free time to have fun with your favourite girls ;).


The character/s in this drawing is a parody of character/s from a franchise and being a parody doesn't respect the characteristics of the original character/s it/they is/are based on (physical characteristics, personality, age, ecc..)
All the characters are 18+.



Rated 1 / 5 stars

well it seems pretty common for your work to get 2-3 stars or so.
not sure if your just trolling or something because it seems hat based on several aspects of your work its almost like your a skilled artist drawing with a handicap intentionally.
in other words its like your drawing with a mouse rather then a tablet.
you seem to have a slight idea of anatomy perspective proportions yada yada... just doesn't look like your trying.

assuming your not trolling and are wanting to improve.
i feel this is due to the fact that the way you draw simply isnt appealing.
this is not to say a gross style cant be appealing like ren and stimpy. but its a lot harder to get gross things appealing.

i know you state " a parody doesn't respect the characteristics of the original character/s it/they is/are based on "

and im afraid i simply have to disagree here.
a GOOD parody should be Abel to take the characteristics of the original and use them as a commentary on the source. not just throw them out the window because who cares its a parody..

this is not to say you cant parody how ever you want but it honestly just seems like that line was only there to try and prevent anyone from complaining that it only resembles the source at a passing glance.

but i encourage you to keep at it!
keep cracking that whip till you find you knish.

Lenbasisky responds:

Let's talk about your considerations. Speaking of the anatomy, i can't say to be perfect but at the same i'm not so atrocious as you say. Yes, i fucked up the back and the arms of both the characters, but take in consideration that this is an old drawing and with all respect, if you want to come here to tell me how to draw the anatomy, at least i would pretend to see a such critique on one of my recent drawings. Because, with the time, i learned to resolve some mistakes like this one and if you take a look to my other drawings, you won't find such error. And let's be franc with your "critique" about the anatomy. If you want to do a critique, you have to do a critique which puts in evidence the errors of the drawings, so in this way, the artist would be able to correct these ones and improve himself/herself. Something that you didn't do here because you were too general. As i said previously, i'm not consider myself a master of the anatomy, but my knowledge about it is enough to permit me to understand what i fucked mainly in the drawings, but if i was an artist who is trying to do some practise, your critique would be completly useless, because it wouldn't help me to improve myself. So next time you do a such critique, be sure to have in mind such advices.
Speaking of the parody, i don't say to disagree with you about the fact the parody might be satirical, but a parody doesn't have to criticize something to be considered parody. The parodies to be considered such, have to make fun of something with or without morals and critiques behind it. Some perfect examples are the Scary Movies and all their clones as Epic Movie, where the characters, who are a parody of other character, exists with the only reason to make stupid and funny the movie. And i'm doing the same thing with all my art, but with the only difference, that instead to create a parodizied content with the purpose to be funny i create instead a parodizied content with the purpose to be sexy and provocative. So if you don't like my parodies because they don't respect your standards it's ok and i'm not going to convince you of the contrary, but do more researches next time before to say something that it's true only in part as say that a parody must be satirical to be considered a parody. And if exists that disclaimer about the parody, it's to explain to who is looking at the drawing that the character in this one isn't that one who is based on. For example, Kirle and Kirla even if they have in common some characteristics with Kirlia, it should be wrong to consider them the same character, because the first two have the body and the habits of a human. All characteristics that Kirlia doesn't have.
At last, let's speak about your critique in general. You accused me to be a troll just because: this drawing has some errors that i didnt notice at the time; it looks like shit for you cause you think that it was drawn with a mouse; and cause this drawing as the other ones as only 2-3 stars.
With all the respect, if there is a troll here it's only you. This "critique" you wrote not only is too general and full of half disinformations, but with this one you weren't even trying to help me out to improve myself, but just to say that my drawing was shit and to complain facts related to the parody with also a rude behavior. And don't tell me that something like keep cracking that whip till you find you knish" has to help me out as motivator, because it's just an immature bullshit and we know it both. I wouldn't surprise if something like your comment could be made just to annoy me. This isn't the first time I saw trolls writing stuff like this one just to annoy the artists (especially that ones who draws porn). And the words of a trolls dont deserve any consideration and respect. And let me tell this. If you are troll, you should ashamed of yourself and learn to be mature instead to do bullshits like this one.
But as artist, if you didn't have the the intention to troll, let me say something to you very important.
Even if you're right about the anatomy or you think to know enough to destroy what i wrote about the concept of parody, that doesn't justify the fact to be rude in a critique as you did. That's just unprofessional and immature and a serious critique doesn't have to be characterized by such elements. And as i said, be sure to do some researches before to complain something. It will help you to avoid situations like this one. All what i had to say, i said it. Troll or not, you have to learn to be mature and professional. That's all. But in any case, i thank you to bring my attention to the mistakes of this drawing. I will be sure to resolve when i will have some free time.