Be a Supporter!

Credits & Info

Uploaded
Sep 18, 2013 | 8:51 PM EDT

If you liked this, check these out!


Author Comments

NONSENSE! After an unfortunate incident, Socrates Jones must debate a host of philosophers in order to win back his life. More than slightly inspired by the Ace Attorney series.

Authors note: This is for real this time, by the actual creators! The person who was pretending to be us didn't even upload the most recent version. That's just lazy game theft, that is.

Reviews


enimalxenimalx

Rated 5 / 5 stars

For a moment, this game made me feel I was a real philosopher...



LushmossLushmoss

Rated 5 / 5 stars

Best game I've played for a while! It thoroughly absorbed me. I think that HeavyTank's comments (5 below) are on the ball, but despite them I think this is worthy of 5-stars,

Nifty!



Noxifer626Noxifer626

Rated 5 / 5 stars

Excellent game!
Please make a sequel!


People find this review helpful!

kaldkald

Rated 5 / 5 stars

Great game.

Best I played in n years!

Think this game would be great to help grade philosophy students!

If your able to finish the game without resorting to the ugly head argument you get +1 point!

Well done!



mr0661mr0661

Rated 5 / 5 stars

Loved it. Though I disagree with conclusion with Hobbes. There was some real difficulty in last one, when I noticed problems in Arbiters arguments, but didn't know how to express those. In all game was really good, and it took me thoroughly inside it, so much that I couldn't stop playing before I saw conclusion.

Here is my thoughts about Natural state of Man and social contracts. Formed in 04:30 AM, but I'm pretty sure that this is valid.
______
It won't create infinite regression. It is actually social contract between strong and weak, ruler one being weak. Rulers task is to do menial tasks and for return they get marginal power.

Natural state is what brings most of the problems. It is easy to demonstrate that people are not naturally in constant war with each others. This is demonstrated when, for example, in actual wars, people show mercy to opposing side(there are better examples, but this one popped in my mind). Even after both have orders to kill the enemy, such orders cause enormous stress. This kind behavior shows that kill or be killed is not natural between humans and that there exists some other guidelines.

Contract cannot be referred in this case, because to be called a contract, both sides have to agree with terms. Any social contract between enemy is void, because there is no knowledge of agreed terms.

Completely silent, undocumented contract, in which participant are not aware of, or even aware of each other, can't be considered a contract.


People find this review helpful!