Be a Supporter!

Credits & Info

Sep 18, 2013 | 8:51 PM EDT

If you liked this, check these out!

Author Comments

NONSENSE! After an unfortunate incident, Socrates Jones must debate a host of philosophers in order to win back his life. More than slightly inspired by the Ace Attorney series.

Authors note: This is for real this time, by the actual creators! The person who was pretending to be us didn't even upload the most recent version. That's just lazy game theft, that is.



Rated 3 / 5 stars

the points the protagonist makes don't fit quite with the prompts for those points so I frequently had to guess and use the process of elimination to figure out how to have him make that point.


Rated 5 / 5 stars

This was a fantastic game. It really makes you think, and it left a sort of feeling of pride when you managed to beat it. Definitely one of my new favorites!


Rated 5 / 5 stars

I'm so glad someone finally made an extremely thought out, well made Ace Attorney style game!
I love all of the little quirks that the characters have, and the animations fit really well.
The music flows nicely with the progression of events, and I'm really excited to finish the game.
Excellent job guys, I can't wait to see what you come out with next!


Rated 5 / 5 stars

Amazing game. I loved Phoenix Wright and I loved this. Picking the subject of morality i think was a good one. However, I'd love to see some sort of sequel (I know I'd put some money in a kickstarter) where another philosophical topic was chosen such as epistemology or metaphysics.


Rated 3 / 5 stars

Honestly, this was extremely frustrating for me. I appreciate the effort, but a few parts of the game are very flawed. Euthyphro is attempting to suggest that mankind is flawed, so I pose that perhaps he's flawed in his assumption that his understanding of right and wrong is higher than average because he's studied the gods. He conceded that perhaps his viewpoint could be flawed as well, so the Arbiter jumps in saying that I'm being a dick for pointing that out. Bullshit, Euthyphro made a fallacious statement and I corrected him. If a main part of his argument is that mankind is flawed, then he concedes every subsequent statement he makes and is a piss poor debater. I'm not playing a game where common logic is trumped by your attempt to force the storyline into a linear experience. If you're ever in an actual debate, don't ever make an egomaniacal blanket statement like "mankind is flawed" in an effort to further your point.