Be a Supporter!

Credits & Info

May 15, 2011 | 9:19 PM EDT
  • Daily 5th Place May 17, 2011

If you liked this, check these out!


Log in to save your medals! Don't have an account? Create one for free!

Garbage 5 Points Terrible Game
Normal 5 Points Bad Game
Bronze 10 Points Good Game
Silver 25 Points Nice Game
Gold 50 Points Great Game
Deity 100 Points Perfect Game
Hacsev Secret Medal: Unlock this medal to view its details!
Cheater! Secret Medal: Unlock this medal to view its details!
Weebl Secret Medal: Unlock this medal to view its details!

Author Comments

Take the Abusive Review Quiz and see if you can manage to get 20/20 votes right.

Also, this was a 10 hour challenge.

9 Medals Added, but waiting for approval, I hope they get approved*

EDIT: Made it harder by hiding the score bar and removed the cheat of pressing tab on the "Help" button and clicking the useless button for +1 to the score.
EDIT2: Since medals only appear once, I added a "Resend Medals" button in the Credits. Notice: it will only resend the ones you got after completing the quiz, sorry.
EDIT3: Fixed an issue if you get 0 on the quiz.
EDIT4: Daily 5th!? Thanks to all newgrounders!Also, fixed the replay button which was not appearing and included 2 links to submissions from reviews I took. If you find any more bugs, please PM me.
EDIT5: Medals got Approved, go get 'em!
EDIT6: Fixed a couple of issues with the medals. If you still have issues let me know through a PM.



Rated 4.5 / 5 stars


i like the concept!!! i hope the medals get up soon!

People find this review helpful!
Hacsev responds:

They're up!


Rated 5 / 5 stars


Great Idea, I would have liked this more if it was a small bit longer oh well.

I have some ideas if you want to make a sequel.

Difficulty mode! That would have been great! Easy, Medium, Hard.

Browse some real reviews which are so retarded (like the one below) and screenshot it in. Great game, Nice one on the award

People find this review helpful!
Hacsev responds:

Thanks for the review! I appreciate the idea, but for the next one I'm going to make the reviews appear randomly.


Rated 2 / 5 stars


I don't know how to put this, but it was really bad made. First, the design could be better. Quality of the graphics etc.

Poorly programmed. Your medals aren't registred in the system, so your users only get medals with 0 points.

You could easily put more reviews for question and they could be presented better.

I think you should look through my review and think of it as constructive and to help you further.

Hacsev responds:

How could you say you hated the graphics. They're from this site, or do you actually hate newgrounds? It doesn't matter if the medals are approved, that is TomFulp who approves them. At least they are working. There would be more reviews in the 2nd version.


Rated 3.5 / 5 stars

Needs Improvement

The graphics are nice, but I don't like how the reviews are laid out, nor how the buttons kind of move up and down. Setting them up such that the button is in the same place every time would have been nice, and I would have also liked having the number question I was on displayed. I had no idea how long the quiz was, so I didn't know when I would get my score or medals or anything!

The sound was also kind of obnoxious and repetitive, and the grading system is oftentimes a matter of opinion, as review mods have mentioned that they interpret the rules differently. For instance, I currently have a Deity whistle, yet I only was awarded a Silver whistle upon completing this quiz. Coop is a mod... Refer to his review for more info.

Lots of people find this review helpful!


Rated 3.5 / 5 stars

I like what you are doing here.

Now I really had no real issue that we may have disagreed on some of the concerns behind these reviews. What I'm happy about is the point you put across with this game. Many of us tend to let abusive reviews slip on by without judging them whatsoever. I even admit I don't try to acknowledge them, but I have always seen them as a nuisance.

Also this shows that we really should post things more relavent to the subject of the flash/art/audio/whatever and try to help construct the author's view and ability by inserting constructive criticism and not hateful messaging, stupid remarks, or idiotic absurdities.

Now I'm not sure exactly how you graded the scores, but I suggest that we don't worry whether a review is helpful or not. Seeing how this is the 'abusive review game' we should focus only on catagorizing if a review is abusive or not and leave out the determination of whether it is helpful or not, that is all a matter of opinion, but as for the abuse....that is something clearly stated in the rules.

Nice game. 7/10 and 3/5.

Lots of people find this review helpful!