The 5 Second Collab

Score:
rated 3.38 / 5 stars
Views:
11,655 Views
Share Links:
Genre:
Other
Tags:
collab
quick
multi
sec

Click on an icon to vote on this!

Credits & Info

Uploaded
May 4, 2011 | 7:55 PM EDT
File Info
Movie
4.5 mb

Related Stuff

If you liked this, check these out!


Author Comments

A group of animators got together and made short, 5 sec animations. This is the result. Enjoy it people!

Still waiting on some people to accept portal buddy requests.

Check out the collab thread here:
http://www.newgrounds.com /bbs/topic/1229966/

Thank you Tom for the front page!

Thanks to everyone for the helpful feedback. That kind of stuff helps me make better collabs in the future!

Reviews


EdacusEdacus

Rated 4 / 5 stars May 5, 2011

<3 Collabs.

Even if the animation was bad, not funny or have a point what so ever... to get a group of people following certain criteria on the internet... especially Newgrounds... is always an achievement, and for that I say kewdos.



PsychoPoptartPsychoPoptart

Rated 2 / 5 stars May 5, 2011

Meh. Work on it.

This collab would have been decent if all of the artists were decent themselves. Sadly, they were not. Im giving this a four because of the few artists who were actually good.


People find this review helpful!

SketchtechSketchtech

Rated 1 / 5 stars May 5, 2011

A waste

I'm sorry, but this just isn't front page material. There is no purpose to this collab. What entertainment could I possibly get from bunch of animations that are no longer than five seconds each. The animation was mediocre at best and the song was annoying. Just not very good at all. Try again, brother.


People find this review helpful!

AuromKantanaAuromKantana

Rated 1 / 5 stars May 5, 2011

Wow... this is lousy...

Honestly... I can't imagine why this got frontpage. let's start with the premise; five second colab. You need to have some EXCELLENT people working on a five second colab for it to turn out even mildly good... and you apparently didn't. Most of the shorts were completely unfunny, and they were all utterly random. Seriously, five seconds is generally just not enough time to get anything good out of a short. Second, the quality of most of the shorts was... pretty bad. Honestly, they all looked like they were done in about 20 minutes to half an hour. if you're going to make something, to be viewed by other people, you should at lease put the time into it to make it look good. Finally, (although there are several more things I could rag on, I just don't have time) let's talk music. first, it was way to epic sounding for the material; second, it stopped sounding epic and got annoying pretty fast, and third it was about as unoriginal as you can get. So, in conclusion, I guess I've seen worse... but the fact that this got frontpage... just disturbs me. Sorry guys... I just don't think you deserve it.


People find this review helpful!

VideofanVideofan

Rated 3.5 / 5 stars May 5, 2011

Not bad...

The idea is good, but time pressure on some people greatly muffles their capacity as artists and we see some terrible shorts there.


People find this review helpful!