Be a Supporter!

Credits & Info

Feb 27, 2011 | 3:33 AM EST
  • Daily Feature February 28, 2011

Related Stuff

If you liked this, check these out!

Author Comments
All my vids on my site. It'll link you to a nice high res youtube link. :)
This animation is a combo of rotoscoping, cgi and flash. Before attempting my 3rd animation I felt the need to go back and finish my first one. I expanded on it a bit, and added some satire and easter eggs (let me know if you find them haha) as well as tighten up the action to make it a bit more intense. Sadly, I had to compress the video to about a 1/4 of its original quality to fit it under 10MB. Which kills me a little inside when I see the grainy picture and smothered audio replay. This is becoming a big issue, if anyone knows a way around this let me know.

Enjoy and comment. Your feedback is taken into account. Seriously this entire video was basically made off the feedback from my "test" footage, cause you guys rock. :)

*Update* Thanks for all the views guys that really makes it worth it. Really it does.



Rated 4 / 5 stars March 2, 2011


sure is sexy with the tone and texture of the composition but the animation lacks movement, that would have given it an awesome super sexy look. With the story some work is needed but overall i like.

People find this review helpful!
DangerousBob responds:

thanks, happy you like it.


Rated 5 / 5 stars March 2, 2011

Nice work! :-)

Great flick! :-) I do know that the bigger you make the original, the better it resamples when you shrink it. Make sample rates as high as you can for the original, and shrink the aspect ratio/sound quality as little as you need to. Keep the original large files and if you need to make another one even smaller (or at ANY other resolution), always make them from the original large files, not a prior output file. That reduces transcription drift.

Keep 'em coming! :-)

People find this review helpful!
DangerousBob responds:

thats a good point, I'll try that next time.


Rated 3.5 / 5 stars March 2, 2011


There's a significant lack of actual animation going on in this short, sequences are reused and bulletholes appear without any kind of bullet going into the wall first.

While the character's look great, it's also taking liberties with the actual scene it's paying homeage to. Why does the Terminator go for 0 casualties and then blow up a guy with a grenade? Where is Sarah and John throughout all this?

While the effects when done right, such as the Terminator getting short, it's let down by animation saving techniques. The rising in the fire has very little change in position or flow, the Terminator gets shot to ribbons before pulling out the pistol, the cops don't shoot back at her in the building after the minigun.

It's a nice short in some places but overall is not that brilliant, a good effort for early work but theres a lot of room for improvement here.

People find this review helpful!
DangerousBob responds:

thanks for the input. duly noted.


Rated 5 / 5 stars March 2, 2011


There something more to say that that....... there should be more like this around here

People find this review helpful!
DangerousBob responds:

thanks I'll have to do more!


Rated 4.5 / 5 stars March 2, 2011

Incredibly well done.

Art style was reminiscent of Akira to me in certain scenes, which is a pretty big compliment. End could have used a little work, but overall it's a really unique and nice thing to see here on Newgrounds.

People find this review helpful!
DangerousBob responds:

thanks, yeah I actually looked to akira and ghost in the shell for a lot of the style.
the scene where she comes out of the fire was directly homage to akira.