Check the submission dates.

Given that there's 5-times the number of levels and the addition of red skears, I'm astonished that anyone would rate this lower than the original. Given that nothing became worse, it seems to me that this is clearly better.

Fair point. Thanks for the suggestion.

Glad you liked the level design though.

Broken english was basically to take the piss out of a lecturer.

Play Skears DX. I think you'll prefer that.

Cheers for the review. Stated your thourhgts pretty clearly. Could've maybe broken up your review with new lines though. Also, I come away not sure what you like so much that you gave it a 7. You should've explicitly maybe mentioned what you see as positive aspects.

I give the review a 7.

Stay funky,
- Bez

: A lot harder!!!

+++: good summary

: Overall rating: 5

fair enough.

: I'm still not understanding why you used broken english in the instructions and what not, though... crappeh-spaek wasn't cool in '02, nor is it now, XD haha.

++++: Good point raised. I like the humour you use to describe the shittiness.

: The graphics, presentation, and audio pretty much stayed the same in this game,

+++: True and fairly concise. You implicitly condemn them, given your previous review.

: and I thought you were really taking the easy route out in this one when I found the first 2 levels to be the same as they were in the first 'rol-ovir' game...

++: A nice insight into your experience and thought process.

: but this had far more stages, and the last proved to be extremely difficult! It had many twists that hit you as soon as you thought you'd gotten over the last test of skill...

++++: You describe well your observations and feelings.

: I personally couldn't finish in time before 'the end' shrank and sweeped into the center of screen...

++++: nice to hear of play-experience.

: so

---: Here, I'm not sure if you're using 'so' as a breaking point (i.e. preclude your summary) or if you're using it to point out a direct correlation between your inability to complete 'the end' and the fact that you consider my work done on the gameplay 'good'. I blame my confusion partially on you and your sentence/paragraph structure.

: good work with the gameplay in this version, a definate improvement.

++++: Nice summary.

: Graphics: 2 Sound: 0 Interactivity: 5 Style: 7 Violence: 0 Humor: 0

All seem fair enough and are mirror your review.

Overall, it was a quality review, with a few criticisms, some referred to from another review, and a few compliments and overall positive feeling. You gave insights into your play-experience too.

Great stuff.

8 or 9

Praise, a piece of contructive criticism, some info about your experience, a summary.

Great review.

More feedback would be nicer, but it's nice as it is.

6/10

Stay funky,
- Bez