Score: 8

"The odds: 1069.305068:1"

by: witmoreluke

date: November 14, 2008

If you take the # of people who have seen it: 1,319, divide out the likelihood of voting: 1319/361=3.653739612
So: 1 in every 3.65 people voted. Think about the Quality of the flash: twice as many people SHOULD have voted 0. (Why do they have to make things so COMPLICATED?) to keep things simple, we will use either a 0 or a 5 on our vote scales.
So:3.653739612 * 3=10.96121884. Those are the vote possibilities.
2* as many people should have voted 0. That would mean 7.307479227 people voted 0.
3.653745613 people should have voted 5 out of 5 voted, and I suspect you need at least a 1 to keep the submission on the site. The current is 2.27 out of 5.
Now we have our numbers.
There are long strings of numbers that I really don't feel like typing at 10:56 at night, though I did this problem for you and thought that It was correct.

The odds are 1069.0305068:1

Score: 0

"how did this even get through judgement?"

by: lamapaj

date: November 4, 2008

it was even worse then a pheared.
This was obviously not meant to be good, and no effort what so ever was put into it... you fail!

Score: 0

"I shouldn't even write a review."

by: AnalPenguinFarming

date: July 12, 2008

Normally I would have some kind of advice to give you to make this a better flash, but there's honestly nothing. There was no effort put into this flash at all. Let me lay this out for you more clearly though, since you DID in face request reviews, so here is my format.

Graphics/Animation: 0
If there was a negative score available in this category, you would have it. Anyone with flash can do what you did here. There's a million different things that you could have done to improve this flash to make it better. Even if you had Mario running through the first level of Mario Bros. with Luigi trailing behind him you would have gotten a better score here. There's so much you could have done to improve this flash. But you didn't.

Audio: 0.5
A redeeming quality of your flash because there actually WAS audio, which I'm actually somewhat impressed by that you included at all. It wasn't good quality, but it was still audio, which is why I gave you the bare minimum as a score.

Originality: 0
This wasn't original at all, just a waste of my time.

Humor: 0
It wasn't funny.

Story: 0
No story.

Overall: 0/10
It isn't very often that I EVER give out 0/10s. Trust me there is some spam that has made it through that I've given at least a score of 3 or 4 to because there was more than a white screen with a couple of characters running by on it. This was awful, please don't make the RRC review things like this anymore unless you've put a lot more effort into your flash.

\Review Request Club/

Score: 1

"A waste of our time"

by: Bezman

date: July 11, 2008

The music is kinda funky and the new instruments work well.

Why no music credit?

For that matter, why no plot, variation, change in graphics, humour or anything else of redeeming value?

Given your 'update', it seems you yourself know this isn't that good. I didn't enjoy this either.

I did kinda like the dot's mouth though.

Score: 2

"Effort would be nice.."

by: X-TERRORIST-X

date: July 11, 2008

Honestly, how much time did you put into this? Given, I have seen worse because this still has some animation in it. But this falls into the category of "spam". The music was the only thing that keeps me from giving this submission a zero.

Please, if you are going to ask a club to review your work. Make sure you put some time into making there time worth something.

The amount of effort you put into this is present in your updated remark "Holy crap this passed" This just shows that you are aware you put no effort into this, and that you expected it to have a score under two.

For you next flash, try giving us something to watch in addition to the music. And three frames doesn't really count as an "animation".

= Review Request Club =

-X-