Raise to Review Mod
- Score:
- rated 3.58 / 5 stars
- Views:
- 16,730 Views
- Share Links:
- Genre:
- Simulation - Other
- portal
- newgrounds
- review
- mods
Credits & Info
-
Programming Little-Rena
-
Artist iShirm
-
Voice Actor N00bNation
- Uploaded
- Nov 17, 2007 | 4:16 PM EST
- File Info
- Game
- 6.3 mb
Related Stuff
If you liked this, check these out!
-
Pico's Cousin by Magna- Game
- Rated M
- 681,366 Views
-
Tom Fulp Dress Up by eggatron- Game
- Rated M
- 637,807 Views
-
Newgrounds Levels by Fierras- Game
- Rated M
- 238,212 Views
-
Wasted Youth, Part 1 by GP-studios- Game
- Rated M
- 439,730 Views
-
The Sagittarian 3 by Hyptosis- Game
- Rated M
- 210,583 Views
-
Thing-Thing Arena 3 by Weasel- Game
- Rated M
- 2,404,340 Views
Plenty more like this here!
-
NG Parodies When you've already made fun of everything else, why not make fun of Newgrounds?
Medals
Log in to save your medals! Don't have an account? Create one for free!
Author Comments
DISCLAIMER: This game is not based on how moderation goes because I don't really know what happens. It also isn't very accurate in many ways, I just made it for fun and such so don't take it seriously.
-----
Flag your way to review moderator and then take control of the reviews that are flagged, don't let M-Bot down though and make sure you don't ruin your chances in the flagging stages, a garbage whistle will mean no modship for you.
-----
There are hidden names you can use, some are mentioned in parts of the flash, so be sure to look, but here's one I haven't mentioned in the flash, try using the name "Lordbling" if you get bored. In this, I did add 4 flash animations, that isn't the main point to this though, so don't expect them to be quality. If this turns out to be populare, I will look to add some more reviews to it so they are more random and increase replay value.
Please leave a review, I respond to all :)
Enjoy.
<3
Reviews
Rated 4 / 5 stars November 18, 2007
Interest game
Alright, being that I'm actually a review mod, I would think that this would be a breeze.
The first was part of the flagging was for the most part accurate. As well as voting for the flashes to anyone who doesn't know (0, then 2-5, then whistle).
As for the actual being a review mod part, some the correct answers you had are actually wrong if they were real reviews.
1. The bots don't make reviews lol.
2. Think you might of forgot part in the rules that "reviews that offer no benefit to the author maybe deleted" Of course, that statement is sometimes more subjective (opinionated) rather than objective (based on facts). They could warrant bans also for the degree of unhelpfullness too.
I was pressing ban for some users, and my review mod stat went down. For instance, someone questioning front page. Might want to critique that a little more. And any reason why some people couldn't be banned? Also, why didn't you add any chain mail or links promting outside, unrelated websites? Hell, while I'm trying this review now i see that in nice red letters at the bottom. Surely u couldn't of forgotten that :)
Overall, solid attempt, just lacking in details. Which I guess u wouldn't know if unless u were actually one lol. So...
8/10
I put bot names as reviewers just for humour, lol, none of those names are to be taken serious, hopefully didn't hit on any real names either. I forgot the rule of talking 1337 in the FAQ part of this too, maybe though, I tried to make the pointless ones look like spam reviews.
As for bans, I don't really know too much, it's all guessing for me since I have no idea what a review mod actually judges, the bans where more like a bonus or a heavy penalty, I didn't want to inculde them in all of the reviews otherwise it would be a little too easy. I was going to do a promoting one but I totally forgot same with the chain reviews, I might add them at a later date. The link was on my mind when I was finishing off but then slipped away.
And yeah, all of the review moderation part is just guess work, I made the best attempt I could at it, hopefully it isn't that bad :P
Thanks for the review.
Rated 4 / 5 stars June 25, 2009
Nice!
I liked it, it was simple and it good music and i liked the addition of the animations. Some audio would be nice, but that would be weird i guess. To harry738-7446, i would say to delete that review because it would have no constructive criticism (Not his, but in game). The second was most likely a glitch. I happened to get a good score, i got over 100 points on my first try. All i can say is, it was kind of just.... Simple? I think that would be it, but it was still a nice idea and i enjoyed playing it.
Yeah, simple is all that seems to be possible.
Rated 4 / 5 stars June 11, 2012
Very good game, i wasn't very aware about reviewing on newgrounds (i don't leave a lot of reviews anyway).
I always encounter a glitch at a certain point of the game : after deleting or clearing the 5th review after being a mod, my review mod score always change to be equal to my overall score, even if it's higher or lower.
By the way, does anybody knows how to get the two last secret medals ? I can't find a clue.
Rated 4 / 5 stars April 12, 2012
This is a good teaching game. You can learn all about reviewing. The controls were good. The medals work. I earned them all. Keep up the good work.
Rated 4 / 5 stars November 17, 2007
good
Good game. now when everyone reviews you they are going to be as professional as possible. haha good stuff.
If only ;)